Dept. of miserable jobs: Sugarhouse's Asian Marketing Executive

(Update: Read WHYY's story here)

Remember how Chinatown made that big ole fuss over a neighborhood casino?

Here's more proof why: Sugarhouse’s Asian Marketing Exec:

Sugarhouse Asian marketing exec-Part1

Sugarhouse Asian marketing exec-Part2-c

Sugarhouse Asian marketing exec-Part3

Side note: It’s particularly nice to know the qualifications are in keeping with Sugarhouse’s top-notch standards, i.e. "regularly required to walk, stand, see, talk and hear." (don't want to surprise applicants with unexpected job requirements!)

The casino industry’s well-known targeting of Asian communities provided the primary impetus behind Chinatown’s fierce anti-casino battle and continued opposition to predatory gambling. Just as other communities of color have battled predatory targeting from the liquor and cigarette industry, Asians are clearly in the primary sights of the casino market.

While our fight may have started with Foxwoods landing on our borders, the issue couldn't stop there. Our concerns have always focused as much on the industry itself as it did on the location. Former Foxwoods Chair Michael Thomas summed it up best: After a exchange involving predatory gambling and the Asian community, Thomas told me, "You call it a gambling addiction, I call it a client base." (Sept. 10, 2008, City Hall press conference)

But don’t take my word for it. Asian communities across the country have decried the casino industry’s practices. Consider:

  • Sacramento, CA: In 2008, in the wake of a tragic fatal bus crash involving dozens of Southeast Asian seniors, members of the Southeast Asian community expressed concern and outrage that casino bus operators prey upon Asian seniors who are often lonely and isolated in the U.S. "They are actually going into low income neighborhoods and picking people out," said a Democratic Assemblyman investigating the crash.
  • SEARAC, Washington DC: Southeast Asian Resource Action Center listed one of its 2008 California Priorities as "support legislation to make illegal the targeted solicitation and transportation of elders to the casino for the sole purpose of gambling as it can be interpreted as elder abuse." The Center charges that casinos target "lonely and isolated" seniors for their marketing and advertising and transportation efforts.
  • New Orleans, LA: In 2004, New Orleans metro area casinos received complaints about their Vietnamese language billboards targeting one of the nation's largest Vietnamese communities.
  • New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts: Both New York and Boston Chinatowns had raised concerns about the Connecticut casinos – Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun – which, at the height of their profit-making a few years ago, boasted of running as many as 100 buses a day between the two Chinatowns. Those lines helped assure that as many as 30% of Foxwoods clientele were Asian – in a state with less than 5% Asian population.

So in addition to the servers who have to sling out the crummy food at Sugarhouse’s low-grade restaurant and the security team looking out for abandoned kids or Sugarhouse’s pistol-whipped clientele (here and here), add the Asian Marketing Exec – Sugarhouse’s contribution to economic decline via predatory gambling.

i think that sugar house 's owners

would be disappointed with their overall level of business so far. i don't see any need for that parking garage they had planned. however on the 4 or 5 times i have been there i would say that asians make up almost half the client base. with the overall nos being on the light side i think they might try to target the asian community even more.

Gambling as a regressive tax

The entire idea of using legalized gambling- whether in casinos, racetracks, or simply lotteries- to substitute for taxation is fundamentally unfair. To be more specific, it's regressive, meaning that the poor people who tend to be the biggest customers of such venues tend to spend a greater percentage of their income there than do rich people. All for the minuscule chance of hitting the Big Payoff.

They do have the advantage of being a completely voluntary tax, at least in that nobody forces you to play the slots or buy a lottery ticket under pain of imprisonment. But the overall effect of state-sponsored gambling is to function as a regressive tax, allowing the government to pay for things which it would be reluctant to fund through a formal, perhaps even progressive, tax.

-Z

Unless . . .

It is voluntary . . . unless you're addicted. And of course everything the casinos do actually results in the cultivation of the maximum number of addicts. The predatory tactics include free booze, easy credit, 24/7 operations and of course the slot machine itself, which is the most addictive gambling product in existence. The key question is: what percentage of the profits come from addicted or problem gamblers? The bigger question is: why are Senator Farnese and Representatives O'Brien and Keller not interested in finding out? The President of Parx Casino stated publicly that most of his customers visit his casino 3 or 4 times a week. Yup.

The literature on the regressiveness is overwhelming

http://uss-mass.org/slotonomics.html

Both Rendell and Deval Patrick (D-MA) or even harking back to Brendan Byrne amongst others have fallen into a simple trap: Republicans brand Democrats as tax-happy fanatics. The simple way to get out of this political trap is to implement anything that is not called a tax. Gambling is perfect.

If those elected leaders had the courage of their convictions - assuming they have any - they'd fight back just with Zorro's words. It's a simple and easily publicized evil. I've been to Sugarhouse. It's more depressing, if possible, than AC. A few shots of clearly poor people in wheelchairs entering would go a long way to show that anti-gambling sentiment is not just a la-de-da yuppie position, but a progressive ethical objection.

Joshua Vincent
www.urbantools.org
www.ourcommonwealth.org
Phree Philly

i totally agree but hope that america does not go the same

route as in australia. in australia we have very few casinos but EVERY bar,pub, football, soccer, tennis club in the country has slots . its impossible to get away from them.its really sad to see pensioners sitting there with that blank look on their face putting their pension check through the slots.it got so bad that when russell crowe bought a football team he pulled out evry slot in the club and writes a check for 3 mill to the club every year to make up the diff in the clubs budget.
i would def support high end casinos like in monte carlo where there are no slots and just have extremely high min bet poker , blackjack and dice

Casinos aren't just about the "losers"

Monica Yant Kinney has a poignant piece about Sugarhouse's targeting of Asian clientele and shares the story of Asian Americans United's Lai Har Cheung whose family was deeply impacted by gambling addiction. It's made me a bit uncomfortable to have conversations around casinos describe their clientele as if they are people we don't know, or who we aren't, or we hope we never become. The reality is that casinos actively target neighbors and family members, employees and friends, parents and grandparents and that the resulting gambling addiction impacts a circle even wider than those who frequent the casinos.

Talk, Stand, See, Hear and Walk

Or whatever it was. That is sooooooo funny.

"In this job, you will be required to exist. Occasionally, you will be expected to react to stimuli from your perception of reality."

---
This Too Will Pass, for the guts in your cerebrum.

You must have a pulse to

You must have a pulse to apply for this job.

-Z

But leave your conscience

But leave your conscience at the door.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content