Do the Feds and Kenny Gamble have it out for PHA?

So, according to today's Washington Post, the federal Housing and Urban Development may have revoked local housing funds as political retaliation on behalf of Kenny Gamble:

After Philadelphia's housing director refused a demand by President Bush's housing secretary to transfer a piece of city property to a business friend, two top political appointees at the department exchanged e-mails discussing the pain they could cause the Philadelphia director.

"Would you like me to make his life less happy? If so, how?" Orlando J. Cabrera, then-assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, wrote about Philadelphia housing director Carl R. Greene.

"Take away all of his Federal dollars?" responded Kim Kendrick, an assistant secretary who oversaw accessible housing. She typed symbols for a smiley-face, ":-D," at the end of her January 2007 note.

Cabrera wrote back a few minutes later: "Let me look into that possibility."

Crazy, huh?

This week, Greene sent copies of the e-mails to Sens. Arlen Specter (R) and Robert P. Casey Jr. (D) of Pennsylvania. Greene called the e-mails evidence of HUD's retribution for his refusal to give public property to Gamble. He urged the senators to demand that Jackson and his deputies explain their motives. Jackson is set to testify about HUD matters today before the Senate Banking Committee.

Casey said that he has "serious questions" about the e-mails and that "80,00 low-income Philadelphians deserve answers."

Right on Casey (for once). You can read the article yourself for more details. Basically it's about the crazy Bush administration strong-arming PHA on behalf of Gamble's Universal Homes (it's not clear from the article whether Gamble sanctioned HUD folks cutting off funds to PHA).

This is a great, crystal clear example of not only why we need to boot out the Republicans (particularly these Bush people) in 2008, but also why we need to nominate the Dem who has the best grasp of urban policy issues.

Talk about political gamesmanship--cutting off millions in funds to deal with a severe affordable housing crisis in Philadelphia for the sake of a lot? Jeez.

The missing piece

The missing piece of that Post story is John Street, and what kind of pressure he may have put on the Housing office or didn't put back onto HUD. He slips in and out of that story so fast that if you blink, you'll miss him.

I don't follow, Tim. John

I don't follow, Tim. John Street isn't particularly know to have pull with President Bush and his administration. Can you explain what you mean?

And isn't he a fan of Carl Greene's?

...

There was an Inquirer article over a month ago

There was an Inquirer article about the PHA/Gamble dispute almost a month ago. Gamble reached out to Street to mediate between him and Greene's office. Greene wouldn't budge. So Gamble reached out to HUD instead.

The men were at war over four parcels of land.

Greene refused to give the land to Universal. He said Universal hadn't done any work to earn it. And if Gamble didn't like it, he could get a lawyer to negotiate buying the land.

After Street had left and the meeting had ended, Greene said, Gamble leaned toward him and said, "I don't need lawyers."

"I have friends."

I'm not saying Street necessarily tried to strongarm Greene the way that HUD did. But it is troubling that now he's thrown up his hands, saying this all should have been settled long ago, instead of helping Greene fight back.

If all this is true...

This can explain the core reason behind the recent massive layoff at PHA, including the decreased policing of existing PHA property.

Non-PHA residents who live near PHA homes know all to well what a decrease in PHA oversight in local low-income housing means...

it's time to put the burglar bars on the 3rd and 4th stories of your house.

Specter shows HUD some Philly muscle

From today's Inquirer (http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/20080315_Specter_to_HUD__Fund_Phila...):

The resolution, passed after midnight as a "sense of the Senate" amendment attached to unrelated legislation, is cosponsored by Specter and Sen. Bob Casey. It asks for a one-year extension of the flexible-spending program that the PHA values at more than $40 million - a sum it stands to lose unless HUD relents before March 31.

Because the Senate's action is nonbinding, HUD can ignore it. In a statement yesterday, the agency implied it might.

"We strongly encourage the Housing Authority to do what's in the best interests of the residents they serve by signing the current agreement," which would renew Philadelphia's flexible-spending status for 10 years provided it agrees to comply on access for the disabled, HUD spokesman Steve O'Halloran said.
He declined to say directly whether HUD would comply with the Senate's request for the one-year extension.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content