Marc Stier's blog http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=blog/marc_stier en Ask Allyson Schwartz to run for Governor http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=ask_allyson_schwartz_run_governor <p>From <a href="http://marcstier.com/blog2/?p=6845">Marc Stier at Large</a></p> <p>Barack Obama is back in office and moving in a liberal direction. So now it’s time to think ahead about building progressive power. The most important thing we can do in Pennsylvania is to replace Tom Corbett as Governor. So it’s a little surprising to me is that, with all the talk about this candidate or that, the one Pennsylvania politician who is best placed to defeat Governor Corbett, Congresswoman Allyson Schwartz, is not being asked by everyone to run. The main reason, I suspect, is that most people who pay close attention to politics don’t think she will do so. And some folks, for the usual reasons, have trouble getting their head around the idea of a woman as Governor. </p> <p>I have no inside knowledge about whether Congresswoman Schwartz is considering a race. But I strongly believe that she should run. After explaining why, I’ll come back to the issue of whether she will or not.</p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=ask_allyson_schwartz_run_governor">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=ask_allyson_schwartz_run_governor#comments Allyson Schwartz Governor of Pennsylvania http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8564 Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:09:25 +0000 Marc Stier 8564 at http://youngphillypolitics.com What's the rush? Save the Cohen wage tax rebate! http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=what039s_rush_save_cohen_wage_tax_rebate <p>One of the last accomplishments of long time progressive Councilmember David Cohen—a rebate on the wage tax for those with low incomes—may be repealed tomorrow. It shouldn’t be.</p> <p>There are good policy arguments both for and against the wage tax rebate. I’ll come to some of them in a moment. But, frankly, at the moment those arguments are secondary. The key reason not to repeal the legislation tomorrow is that the decision to put off AVI for a year means that Council is going carry out a broad examination of taxation in the city next year. The Cohen wage tax rebate is not scheduled to go into effect until 2016 anyway. So there is plenty of time to reconsider it as we think through the future of taxation in Philadelphia. </p> <p>Any city like Philadelphia has to balance considerations of progressivity and economic growth. </p> <p>While, progressive taxation has very little negative impact on economic growth in the nation as a whole, and relatively little in states, it can have an impact on cities. If city taxes fall too much on people with higher incomes and businesses, then they can move with their feet. </p> <p>On the other hand, when a quarter of our city or more is poor, a reduction in taxes targeted at those with low incomes really helps people who are struggling at fairy low cost. </p> <p>AVI, when implemented, will make our taxes more progressive and help low income folks. Its’ impact might be greater than a targeted wage tax cut. So, had we implemented AVI this year, I might have been less concerned about losing the Cohen wage tax rebate.</p> <p>But, now that we are waiting for AVI—and while we are uncertain whether it will ever be implemented in a progressive fashion—here’s good reason to keep the Cohen wage tax rebate on the books and reconsider it as part of a complete overhaul of our taxes.</p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=what039s_rush_save_cohen_wage_tax_rebate">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=what039s_rush_save_cohen_wage_tax_rebate#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8499 Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:10:46 +0000 Marc Stier 8499 at http://youngphillypolitics.com The silence is deafening--our broken politics and the schools http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=silence_deafeningour_broken_politics_and_schools <p>Under tremendous financial pressure that is the result of recession and drastic cutbacks in funding from Harrisburg, the SRC is about to blow up our school system. The SRC plan reshuffles the chairs on the Titanic but as far as I can see does little to stop the ship from sinking.</p> <p>They Mayor tells us we have no choice (and by the way, support my property tax proposal.) And so far, not one politician in this city, not one member of Council, not one State Representative or State Senator has made a public statement about this devastating news.</p> <p>Why not?</p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=silence_deafeningour_broken_politics_and_schools">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=silence_deafeningour_broken_politics_and_schools#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8380 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:31:34 +0000 Marc Stier 8380 at http://youngphillypolitics.com Will the Mayor lead a movement to save our schools? http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=will_mayor_lead_movement_save_our_schools <p>Michael Nutter talked a great deal about education during his reelection campaign. His inaugural speech focused on education. He said he wanted to take on responsibility for the schools.</p> <p>But today the SRC announced that the School District in Philadelphia is going to be drastically downsized. Many schools will be closed. More students will attend charter schools. In a school system that has already suffered devastating cutbacks, even if some of these changes make for a more efficient use of resources, the overall consequences for our kids cannot be good. None of the suggested administrative changes deal with the fundamental problem--we don't have the resources to provide our kids with the minimal requirements of a decent education. We don't have money for enough quality teachers, teacher training, school books, and counselors. </p> <p>And the financial problem we face comes from Harrisburg and Governor Corbett's relentless attack on school funding. That has me wondering if Michael Nutter has forgotten his top priority or is simply unwilling to do what it takes to address the funding problem schools face at its source, that is, in Harrisburg.</p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=will_mayor_lead_movement_save_our_schools">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=will_mayor_lead_movement_save_our_schools#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8377 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:54:08 +0000 Marc Stier 8377 at http://youngphillypolitics.com Cohen and Josephs for State Representative http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=cohen_and_josephs_state_representative <p>There are some difficult State Representative races for progressives in the city this year. In two of them, long time advocates of progressive causes, Babette Josephs in the 182nd and Mark Cohen in the 200th , are in races with younger and ambitious challengers, Brian Sims and Numa St. Louis.</p> <p><strong>How do you choose between candidates who have no differences on issues? </strong></p> <p>There are few if any differences on policy between the incumbents and the challengers. Babette and Mark simply have the best voting records in Harrisburg. (When I ran my own race as a challenger and was looking to find questionable votes taken by my opponent, Rosita Youngblood, I quickly compared her votes to those of Cohen and Josephs. There were many differences and, in each case, Cohen and Josephs had taken the progressive view.)</p> <p>So when there are no issue differences, how do you make up your mind in a race like this? </p> <p>Well, you could simply choose the candidate to whom you are personally closest. In that case, I would definitely endorse Brian Sims in the 182nd. We were colleagues at CPL and I really like and admire him. He is smart and energetic and will be a great political leader someday. I don’t know Numa St. Louis as well but I like what I’ve seen of him.</p> <p>And there have been times when I’ve gotten into conflicts with both Babette Josephs and Mark Cohen. When I spoke for Mark at an ADA meeting a week or so ago, his sister Sherrie reminded me that Mark and I once got into a very loud public disagreement. And Babette and I have not seen eye to eye at times either. (In particular, I very much wanted her support when I ran for City Council and did not get it.)</p> <p><strong>Reaching out to the grassroots </strong></p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=cohen_and_josephs_state_representative">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=cohen_and_josephs_state_representative#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8361 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:07:04 +0000 Marc Stier 8361 at http://youngphillypolitics.com Why is this mandate different from all other mandates? http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=why_mandate_different_all_other_mandates <p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">One of the central concerns that conservatives have about the individual mandate is that it would lead to unlimited federal authority over our individual lives. If Congress can require us to purchase health insurance, conservatives sometimes ask, can’t it require us to purchase cars or broccoli or cell phones? </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Defenders of the mandate have been so concerned to show that it is justifiable under the Commerce and Necessary and Proper clauses—and there the argument seems quite straightforward—that we have not been focused enough on making sure that we don’t prove too much. And that’s partly because we tend to be political progressives and are not as worried as conservatives about limiting federal power over our economic lives. We are not libertarians, after all. While we progressive are adamant about defending civil liberties, we generally don’t believe that there is a general right to economic liberty. And thus, unless government forces us to make purchases that reflect particular ideals or conceptions of how we should live our lives, we are not going to get too exercised about government directives in our economic lives.</span></span></p> <p><strong>Why progressives should worry about federal power</strong></p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=why_mandate_different_all_other_mandates">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=why_mandate_different_all_other_mandates#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8355 Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:20:33 +0000 Marc Stier 8355 at http://youngphillypolitics.com We need transparency in criticism as well as budgeting http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=we_need_transparency_criticism_well_budgeting <p>Some critics of Mayor Michael Nutter are calling him out for hiding a real estate tax in his new budget since the budget proposes that after the new market based system of setting property values is put in place, tax rates will be set so that the city takes in an additional $90 million in real estate tax receipts. </p> <p>There is a just a little bit of truth in the criticism. But most of it is really just hogwash.</p> <p>In an ideal world, as the city switched to the new system of setting property values that moved them up to reflect market values, the tax rate would simultaneously be adjusted downwards so that the total take from the real estate tax from one year to the next would be roughly the same. Since the new system is supposed to, and most likely will, give us fairer assessments, some people would pay more and other less. But the overall real estate taxes take in by the city would remain about the same.</p> <p>But we don’t live in an ideal world. Because the property assessment system has been totally broken, the values placed on property for the purposes of the real estate tax have not gone up as the actual market values of those properties have gone up. There has been no city wide reassessment since 2004 and in response to protests other upwards reassessments have been rolled back.</p> <p>This failure to capture rising real estate market values, along with the recession’s effect on overall tax returns, is why the city had to enact two temporary increases in the property tax rate in the last two years. </p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=we_need_transparency_criticism_well_budgeting">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=we_need_transparency_criticism_well_budgeting#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8343 Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:34:07 +0000 Marc Stier 8343 at http://youngphillypolitics.com Fighting for Our Health http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=fighting_our_health <p align="left"><a href="http://marcstier.com/blog2/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/mockbook2_smaller1.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6305" title="mockbook2_smaller" src="http://marcstier.com/blog2/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/mockbook2_smaller1.png" alt="" width="180" height="240" /></a>During the 18 months of the Health Care for America Now (HCAN) campaign in support of what became the Affordable Care Act, I gave over a hundred speeches to thousands of activists who were working us in Pennsylvania. I frequently concluded my speeches this way:</p> <p align="left">Who is most responsible for the most popular domestic program in our history, Social Security? (Someone would, of course, shout out ‘Franklin Roosevelt.’ Or a history buff would say Senator Wagner.) No, that’s not really true. Franklin Roosevelt was President when Social Security was enacted and his support was crucial. But he came late to supporting it. Long before he did, a mass movement called the Townsend Movement made retirement security an issue of national importance. The Townsend movement held meetings, just like this one, in living rooms, in church basements, in fire houses, in union halls, and in public libraries. It never brought 100,000 people to tin Washington. But little by little, one city and congressional district at a time, it created the pressure and support without which Franklin Roosevelt would never have embraced and Congress would never have passed the Social Security Act.</p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=fighting_our_health">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=fighting_our_health#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8311 Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:18:16 +0000 Marc Stier 8311 at http://youngphillypolitics.com As Joshua takes power let's thank the Moses of Montgomery County Democrats http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=joshua_takes_power_let039s_thank_moses_montgomery_county_democrats <p>On Wednesday, Josh Shapiro and Leslie Richards will take office as Montgomery County Commissioners after winning the most important political race in the state in November. As you must know, this will be the first time in this history of the County that Democrats have controlled the County Commission.</p> <p>At the same time Joe Hoeffel will be leaving public office, perhaps for the last time.</p> <p>But everyone, from Josh and Leslie down, know that without the efforts of Joe Hoeffel, there would be no Democratic majority on the County Commission in Montgomery County. Without Joe, Allyson Schwartz would probably not be the member of Congress for the 13th Congressional district which includes a big part of Montgomery County and which Joe once represented. And many other Democratic public officials would not old the offices they do today.</p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=joshua_takes_power_let039s_thank_moses_montgomery_county_democrats">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=joshua_takes_power_let039s_thank_moses_montgomery_county_democrats#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8279 Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:19:42 +0000 Marc Stier 8279 at http://youngphillypolitics.com An open letter to Mayor Nutter about Occupy Philadelphia http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=open_letter_mayor_nutter_about_occupy_philadelphia <p>Dear Mayor Nutter,</p> <p>In the last few months, the Occupy Movement, of which Occupy Philadelphia has been an important part, has had a dramatic impact on politics in America. At a time when most Democratic politicians have shied away from raising critical issues of inequality in income, wealth, and power, the movement has moved them to the forefront of our public debates. Democratic legislators in Harrisburg and Washington have recognized that this movement has already made a difference. It promises much more for the future.</p> <p>Thus, while we have been proud of your response to Occupy Philadelphia to this point, we were terribly disappointed to read your recent statement about Occupy Philadelphia. It is disrespectful to the movement and the people who have created it. It raises complaints about Dilworth Plaza with regard to public safety and cleanliness that are exaggerated about that site yet true of too many neighborhoods in our city, where men and women suffer from dangerous and unkempt streets.</p> <p>We understand that a renewal project, which will create much needed jobs, is in the future of Dilworth Plaza. We have and will continue to encourage Occupy Philadelphia to work with the city to find an alternative location when that project is ready to begin. However, our understanding is that the city has not been forthcoming in discussing, in any detail, alternate sites with Occupy Philadelphia. Nor has the city been transparent in offering details about when construction will begin at Dilworth Plaza. </p> <p>So we encourage you and your administration to continue to be supportive of the broad goals of this important populist movement and to put aside bluster and threats and, instead, work with Occupy Philadelphia to address the issues that have arisen at the current site and a possible move to a new location.</p> <p>Above all, we encourage you to avoid any precipitous actions that might lead to unnecessary and perhaps violent confrontation. </p> <p>Sincerely,</p> <p><a href="http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=open_letter_mayor_nutter_about_occupy_philadelphia">read more</a></p> http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=open_letter_mayor_nutter_about_occupy_philadelphia#comments http://youngphillypolitics.com/?q=crss/node/8247 Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:20:03 +0000 Marc Stier 8247 at http://youngphillypolitics.com