- Rep. Vitali calls for moratorium on drilling in our forests on the same day as Rendell's Budget Address
- We have to burn down the school to save it? The really nice school?
- Hey Ben: Questions about tax amnesty
- US Rep. John Murtha, June 17, 1932 – February 8, 2010
- Getting Real Answers from Gubernatorial Candidates
- It is always a good thing when our government works well
- Courtfighter: Delaware County Judge Maureen Fitzpatrick A Bigot? You Judge How Often Bigotry Occurs In Media, PA
- We'll Get You Ready for State Budget Release Tuesday
- ONE Praises U.S. Treasury Announcement to Work with International Partners to Relieve Haiti’s Debt
- A giant toxic monster is coming your way OR no rigs before regs!
A Step Towards Better State Government
Yesterday, a bipartisan group of legislators introduced a number of reforms that would be a strong first step in fixing how Harrisburg governs. No more 2AM passage of bills (a tactic made infamous in the payraise, but, certainly used far and wide elsewhere). No more keeping records secret. And no more bottling up bills that leadership doesn't like:
Among other things, the group of Republican and Democratic House members from every corner of the state wants the legislature to live by the same information disclosure rules as other public agencies.
They are now exempt from the state's Open Records law, which requires borough councils to order authorities to disclose upon request government-related documents within 10 days.
As a result, reporters and members of the public are restricted in what House- and Senate-related documents they can review.
...
Additionally, if the group gets its way, there would be no more late-night sessions: No votes would be allowed between midnight and 8 a.m. The legislature was vilified last year for passing the pay raise at 2 a.m. July 7, without debate, as its final official act before breaking for a two-month summer recess.
Each legislator, under the package, would get to pick one bill they sponsored per session that would be guaranteed at least a committee vote. Lawmakers have long groused that, unless they are in leadership posts, compelling a vote on many pieces of legislation is difficult at best.
I think this is a good start. I especially like the last one. Too many good bills get bottled up because people like Perzel and O'Brien decide they shouldn't get a vote.
more below...
As for the middle of the night thing, I think a much better, stronger idea than elminating bills passed in the middle of the night is to have a 48 hour hold on every piece of legislation up for a vote. Except symbollically, I don't care if a bill gets passed in the middle of the night. What I really care about is that legialtors are passing terrible bills, with ammendments quickly written into them, before the public or non-lobbyists have a chance to look at it. Case in point- the Leave no Billboard Behind Act, where John Perzel wrote a provision in a small section of law into a bill about illegal dumping that basically targeted SCRUB, the philly anti-billboard group. In fact, SCRUB supporters, not seeing what was in there, ending up voting for the bill.
To me, if legislators want to stay up real late, more power to them. But, again, we should have a few days to see what bills are up for a vote.


strings attached...
This does seem like a good thing, but the bi-partisan thing weirds me out. Are moderate/conservative R's willing to do this because they are threatened by the newly elected extremists who rode the pay raise to victory in the Primary?
If so, does this kind of effort ultimately hlep R's maintain the majority? I mean why isn't this being sponsored by the Democratic Caucus as THEIR thing, to establish D's as the right-minded, responsible ones rather than ceding to a "bi-partisan" effort.
Am I being too cyncical?
According to her office, Rep.
According to Manderino's office, Rep. Tangretti is the primary sponsor of the legislation. I called Tangretti’s office, but they said they wouldn’t have a full list until tomorrow.
I don’t know much about Tangretti.
Common Cause bill?
Is this the same thing that Fumo put forward in the Senate in partnership with Common Cause? I think there was something in that one about a waiting period, which I agree with Dan about being crucial. If there's been one attempt before then there probably have been more - I would LOVE for this to actually happen!
And as for coalitions - yes, there are some seriously weird people jumping into bed together in Pennsylvania these days.
But this is good for everyone, seize the opportunity.
Remember, open democratic processes ALWAYS favor Dems in the long run!
Good Government
While I love the idea of every legislator getting a committee vote and expanded open records, good government stuff, in general, makes me antsy.
Right now this minimum wage thing is getting down to the wire, and if we had to wait 48 hours, for example, or any length of time, to get through votes, it would be a nightmare.
It's a case of "be careful what you wish for."
Right now, there is a mood to pass a Minimum Wage increase. If we fail to get this sucker done before the summer recess, though, I don't know if it will happen. Will we have that mood again when they come back?
Will the Governor be able to use the budget as negotiating tool as he might be doing now to help us?
Who knows.
Sometimes, our side just wants to get stuff done, too, and good government rules could totally shaft us.
---
BradyDale OnLine
I suspect it's the other way
I suspect it's the other way around. Conservatives are flexing their muscles and trying to undermine Perzel. They want to oust him, but they don't have the votes.
I haven't seen a sponsors list, so I'm not 100% sure. I agree that the D's should have taken the lead on this. But, seriously, is there any kind of plan to take back the House? Even a website?
Couldn't find list...
I looked online and could not find out who else was a part of this group. Anyone have time to call Manderino's office, find out, and post a list for us all to see?