Philadelphia’s Children Need More High Quality Early Childhood Education

In a landmark study of the effects of high quality early childhood education (ECE) the Perry Preschool study identified a group of low-income African-American children assessed to be at risk of failure in school and randomly assigned them into a control group that did not receive preschool and a treatment group that received high quality preschool at age 3 and 4. These two groups were then tracked through age 40. The study found that 60 percent of the kids receiving high quality preschool earned $20,000 or more by age 40 compared to just 40 percent of the control group. While 55 percent of the control group had been arrested five or more times by age 40, this was true for just 36 percent of the kids receiving high quality preschool (read more about the Perry Preschool study by clicking here).

Click Read More to See The Rest

Subsequent studies estimate that for every dollar invested in high quality early childhood education there are 10 dollars of benefits that accrue from that investment. Despite these high returns we as a society fail to fully invest in ECE. Education is a classic example of a public good where markets left to their own devices fail to provide enough of the service. The results from the Perry study allude to why, although there are substantial benefits that accrue to children particularly as they enter adulthood there are also benefits that accrue to people other than the children receiving care and education, that is reduced future expenditures on welfare, the criminal justice system and of course higher adult earnings translate into greater tax revenue. In the United States the education and care of young children from toddlers up to age 5 is left largely to parents to finance, unlike the education of children from age 5 to 18. So while investments in ECE more than pay for themselves, leaving working parents to finance the bulk of the service, forces them to settle for substandard education and care which translates into children entering elementary school less prepared to learn, less likely to eventually graduate from high school and more likely to live at or near poverty as adults.

Fifty-years ago there was a consensus that robust transportation networks were crucial to an economy heavily dependent on manufacturing. That consensus produced large scale public spending on transportation networks like the interstate highway system. In an information economy we need a new consensus in support public investment in the basic infrastructure of the information economy, people. ECE is one part of that basic infrastructure. Our high standard of living is dependent on our capacity to create a workforce that is more productive than workers in Bangalore and Beijing.

In Philadelphia where one in four residents lives below the poverty line and 35 percent of children live in poverty, any comprehensive effort to reduce poverty must include greater investment in high quality early childhood education.

Mark Price is a labor economist at the Keystone Research Center in Harrisburg. The views expressed in this post are his alone. The Keystone Research Center (http://www.keystoneresearch.org) a research and policy development institute, was created to broaden public discussion on strategies to achieve a more prosperous and equitable Pennsylvania economy.

Don't know

If you had a chance to hear Jonothan Kozol today on WHYY. The "savage inequalities" he talked about are related to the phonomenon you discuss in your post.

One stat that stood out was the fact that while in Lower Merion they spend somewhere on the order of (if I remember correctly) $17,000 per student per year, the figure is $9,000 per year in Philly schools.

He pointed out that the contention that you can't "just throw money at the system" to fix it is disengenuous, as it frequently comes out of the mouths of those who "throw money" at the systems that educate their own children - but criminally deprive other children of the same funding. The short-term mentality of those who can't see the benefits of spending on "social" infrastructure support is unbelievably self-serving.

By the way, he also pretty much ripped Vallas' policies, (specifically the dismally uncreative standardization of early reading curriculum), Philly's public schools in general, and more specifically, their outrageous de facto segregation. According to Kozol, the current levels of segregation in this country's public schools are as currently virtually as bad as they were during the sixties - as a result of the Supreme Court slowly dismantling the progressive programs that grew out of Brown vs. The Board of Education.

let's throw money

throwing money would help. the term "throwing money" is a conservative frame. we should be using terms like investing. if the consensus is that students will be better proepared if they had computers in clssrooms or would beneft from a reduction in class size then we need to realize that these things are possible with more money.

let's see how well the school sytem in Lower Merion would be after 5 years if the invested only 9,000 per student annually.

all these city tax breaks result in a disinvestment into public education.

Tax breaks the problem?

I don't think it is a situation the Philadlephia doesn't want to spend more money on education, it just comes down to a lot of the SEPTA conversation. You need money to spend money.

This means you need to do different budget spending or generate more revenue.

One of the biggest problems, I feel, is that the city doesn't COLLECT the taxes it is supposed to. I live north of Girard college. Looking at all the property tax records, there are a lot of people (non vacant) that haven't paid property taxes in 10 years! And we aren't talking about $8K a year center city property taxes. Like $500 a year. Yes, I know, it is a depressed area, but I live there. Very many of these people can afford the $25-50 a month to pay their property tax. They just know the city won't come after them.

Also, not all of these properties are owned by "poor" people. A lot of the addresses of land owners do not even live in the owners. They are slum lords renting out properties and not paying taxes.

I think ultimately a lot of Philly's problem is its tax policy. They fix that, from commerical to residential, and they can fix a lot of their other problems.

missed it.

I missed it, I will see if I can track it down in the archives sounds like a ball. Love the throw money quotes.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content