Open Thread on The Wire Series Finale

My most elementary thoughts are the ending was very good and worthy of the show.

It may take me some time to decompress the series finale. A few things are coming to mind--first, the fate of Michael Lee is not surprising. I suppose it is better than what I had expected, but if he is following in Omar's footsteps, at least he has a code. I have to admit, after the death of Bodie, Michael became my favorite character.

It turns out that Cedric Daniels, someone who's character has been ambiguous for 5 seasons, has the most honor and character of anyone in the Hall or the police station. It was nice to see him promote Lt. Carver, who now has the rank Daniels had at the beginning of Season 1. It has taken Carver a long time to develop into a good cop. Would he have gotten there without Daniels or Colvin. I doubt it.

Things seem to be looking good for Bubbles-his sister lets him eat at the table. But, what about Dukie. Dukie is, perhaps, the most sympathetic character in the entire show. From a broken home and just broken. To young to work a real job, to scared to go to school, to young for a GED, no where to live, no more friends, etc. Dukie had no control over his destiny from the outset.

The scene at the end with We-Bey and Chris was interesting.

Prez-bo has become a teacher.

I have lots of things to say. It will take me a while.

So, here is an open thread on the issue.

Fearful Symmetry

Michael --> Omar
Carver --> Daniels
Sydnor --> McNulty
Dukie --> Bubbles
Slim Charles --> Proposition Joe
Marlo --> Avon/Stringer
Kenard --> Marlo
Kima --> Bunk
Valchek --> Burrell
Pearlman --> Phelan
Chris --> Wee-Bey
Fletcher --> Gus
Templeton --> Whiting
Nerese --> Royce

The Greek --> The Greek
Levy --> Levy
Bunk --> Bunk

And while Prezbylewski went from a mediocre cop to a noble teacher, Herc went from a mediocre cop to a scumbag investigator.

The whole thing has a wonderful symmetry, which has always been the show's greatest strength.

But:

There is no new Bunny Colvin. No new Frank Sobotka. No new Lester Freamon. And no new Bodie.

These are the four paradigmatic figures that are lost in 21st-century Baltimore, where your experience and inventiveness and your loyalty and your toughness don't matter. All that matters is that you go quietly.

No new Boide?

Every kid on the corner is a Bodie. Remember last season when he realized how expendible he really was with Marlo and the game.

Bodie's status of a major character was to show us exactly what you said, loyalty doesn't matter one bit. He was always just a pawn.

And, he was, for 4 seasons my favorite character.

I am working to elect Larry Farnese to the General Assembly. Unless otherwise expressly stated, this and every comment or blog I post on YPP and any action I take hereon is solely attributable to me and not Farnese or Friends of Farnese

Yeah, Gaetano I think you

Yeah, Gaetano I think you are right here.

David Simon said this about Bodie, Deangelo and Wallace, sitting around the Chess board in season 1:

We knew that if we got a long enough run, all three of the chess players would be out of the game, so to speak. Prison or dead. We did not chart all of their fates to a specific outcome, but we knew that the Pit crew would be subject to an exacting attrition.

Check out the rest of the interview here.

Having the show end was sort

Having the show end was sort of like losing a friend or something.

Also, spoiler alert. If you haven't watched, then stop reading.

Here are some random thoughts:

I thought this season, especially the last three episodes finished strong. But, I thought the whole homeless murder thing was a weird plotline, that had nothing to do with anything, so was more of a distraction than anything else (especially since the season was only 10 episodes).

Sort of along the lines of Tim- as I told Seth offline, a lot of what I read in the last couple weeks was that in effect, David Simon made the seasons about the kids as effectively a prequel. At first, I thought that meant Michael->Avon, but obviously that was not the case. Anyway, other parallels are pretty obvious.

I thought the treatment of Dukie in the last episode was sort of weird. He was generally the most sympathetic, 'pure' character (maybe along with the not forgotten Randy), and his farewell with Michael was crazy at the end of the second to last episode. Yet, in this episode, its like he is completely lost: he was in one scene outside of the closing montage, and in it he had evidently already crossed over to the point where he could easily lie to Prez's face, without much remorse. It just seemed too quick, no anguish, for the kid who we all rooted for for two seasons and who had so much good about him.

Also, Carcetti in season 3 is flawed, but at least sees the bullshit, right? But, by the end, the good angel/bad angel thing pretty dramatically swung, and he went from being flawed, to being basically useless.

Speaking of Mayors, it is funny is seeing Nutter's take on the Wire, which shows me just how different we think. He said this:

It's not that the institutions are flawed but that those institutions are dealing with deeply flawed people, and the responses to those folk are from people with their own problems. None of us is perfect, and you aren't going to find anyone who is until you check into heaven.

I have a dramtically different take. Specifically, that multiple institutions have failed, made ever clearer by season 4. And within those institutions, there are very good people (imperfect, sure) who just lose battles to the 'system.'

The show will be missed.

Dukie

Heaven and Here, my favorite Wire blog, had this entry today on Dukie's fate:

My one huge sticking point with the last two episodes is Dukie. Are we really to believe that Dukie, who has survived so much, would be driven to his Sharad/Bubbles addiction because he lost Bug and Michael? What is his tie to the homeless guy with the cart? I just don’t buy it. I also will admit that I was so hysterical at the end of episode 59 that I could barely see through my tears and was reduced to yelling at jetset, over and over, “Fuck you, Simon! Fuck you!” Not one of my most mature moments. But I felt that scene was so manipulative, so punishing, that I couldn’t deal with it. It was gratuitious. The Wire can really veer towards the sadistic — and I don’t mean that as a compliment.

Exactly. He went from a

Exactly. He went from a character with so much strength to that way too quickly. No transition, no wondering, after watching with incredible maturity his own family's destruction, that he magically turns into an addict, and has no qualms about taking Prez for his money, etc. Seems too out of place. At the very least, they could have left it open-ended.

Or shown him experimenting

Or shown him experimenting with drugs over the course of the season. That, I think, would have made it more plausible.

Really

Dukie's descent into addition is niether suprising nor out of place to me.

Dukie's entire life has been a story of neglect. In Season 4, he was already broken. The only thing that kept him away from drugs then was his friendship with Prez, Michael and Randy (and maybe ever Naymond).

In Season 5, Dukie is no longer in school (no Prez) and he loses Michael and Bug.

He is too young to work (unlike Poot) a real job. Too scared to go to school. Not tough or athletic enough to box. And, he isn't hard enough to be on the corner.

Where else could he have gone? Without Michael, Dukie is gone.

As for his taking money from Prez, I know this is a TV show and all, but I've seen addicts in the early stages of addiction. Taking money from a friend or teacher is "no thing" and it comes quite easily once that first lie is told. After that,it goes quick.

I am working to elect Larry Farnese to the General Assembly. Unless otherwise expressly stated, this and every comment or blog I post on YPP and any action I take hereon is solely attributable to me and not Farnese or Friends of Farnese

Dukie's question

One of the most poignant questions I thought Dukie asked was in a conversation with Cutty: " How do you get from here to the real world?" The same question can be asked by Marlo, Carcetti, Gus, Bunny, McNulty or any of the myriad characters. It's a sad testament to how how isolating and crippling and consuming each of the worlds portrayed are when there are so few options -- to me one of the Wire's biggest weaknesses.

A lot of people

Thought Michael would become Avon.

But, when Snoop said to him that he was never like one of them, and knowing he couldn't leave the game (he too had no where to go), I had a feeling like he'd end up like Omar.

I don't know why. But it makes sense. Michael had a code. Probably because he was Bugs brother or Dukie's friend or whatever--he developed at least some respect for the innocents of the West Side.

I am working to elect Larry Farnese to the General Assembly. Unless otherwise expressly stated, this and every comment or blog I post on YPP and any action I take hereon is solely attributable to me and not Farnese or Friends of Farnese

There are plenty of new

There are plenty of new corner boys, absolutely. But there is nobody who is presented as remotely admirable. I do think that there is a sense of deterioration in the industries, and the drug industry is no exception. Some of that is just old-head talk, but some of that is real.

Was Bodie admirable?

Or was he just the best of the bunch?

Honestly, I struggle with this. I really wanted to like Bodie. But, he did all of the bad stuff too. He killed Wallace (with Poot). He was in that shoot-out that killed the little kid.

At the same time, he didn't like Marlo's game. No one did. Was it more ruthless, or was he just on the losing side?

Same thing with the Avon v. Marlo issue. Was Avon that much better than Marlo? We didn't see Avon take power. When we first met him, he was at the apex of his power.

I am working to elect Larry Farnese to the General Assembly. Unless otherwise expressly stated, this and every comment or blog I post on YPP and any action I take hereon is solely attributable to me and not Farnese or Friends of Farnese

I think the Wire plays with that

And they have from the beginning. I remember when they first presenting D'Angelo, and began unraveling him, having to continue to remind myself, this guy has killed someone -- maybe two people if you think he killed Avon's girlfriend instead of Wee-Bey.

And likewise Poot and Bodie argue about whether Marlo's killing Little Kevin is any different from their killing Wallace.

My point is that there isn't any character placed in the same structural position as Bodie. And that could be telling or it might not be at all. But I think, like with Bunny and Sobotka and Freamon, it shows that experience and loyalty do not really matter.

Also

There is at least a suggestion that Avon has crossed a serious line by first killing the maintenance man, then killing and torturing Brandon, and finally looking to kill Wallace -- all of those things give D'Angelo, Wallace, and many other people serious pause. Likewise, Marlo at the top of his game seems to be killing people for no real reason -- the security guard at the pharmacy, Little Kevin, others.

Isn't the whole point

that there is no good or bad, admirable and evil? Everyone survives to the extent that they can, keeps their humanity to the extent they can, and loses it when survival depends on it.

Or putting it another way

Value is an illusion. It disintegrates. Value dies because it is not valued.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content