Hi folks, I just got this email from Prometheus Radio...
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Prometheus Radio Project
Subject: Police critics arrested, home seized in police raid.
Police critics arrested, home seized in police raid.
June 13th, 2007. Philadelphia Police descended upon the home of homeowners
who have been questioning police tactics in Mayor Nutters new "stop and
frisk" program. 4 residents were arrested in their home at 17th street and
Ridge Avenue, and the police are in the process of sealing the building.
The homeowners are being held at the police station, no charges have yet
been filed.
Homeowners had been circulating petitions calling upon Mayor Nutter and
Police Commissioner Ramsey to attend community meetings on the use of
excessive force, surveilance cameras, and the new "stop and frisk"
policy. The mayor and police chief have declined to attend these community
forums, but instead have seized the home and possessions of those who
question "Stop and Frisk," and are currently holding them in jail. While
many civil liberties advocates and residents of affected neighborhoods
have questioned the new police tactics, few imagined that simple criticism
of a city policy could result in the seizure of one's home and subject
residents to arrest.
More details coming soon.
contact:
Danielle Redden 267-243-5231 dredden@critpath.org
Jade Walker 215-939-2386 kaleliberation@yahoo.com
Prometheus Radio Project
"Freeing the Airwaves from Corporate Control!"
prometheusradio.org
(215)727-9620
P.O. Box 42158 Philadelphia, PA 19101











Can you back up the "community meetings" a little?
Some of the multiple forums Nutter and Ramsey had early on to talk about their actual law enforcement strategies.
http://www.kyw1060.com/Police-Commissioner-Ramsey-To-Hold-Community-Meet...
Then there was this Inquirer article about the community outreach Ramsey and Nutter undertook around the police beating captured on news copter video.
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/philadelphia/20080525_Ramsey__Nutte...
And then there was this forum hosted by the ADA.
http://www.phillyada.org/blog/?q=node/20
And this forum hosted by Concerned Black Lawyers and moderated by Damon Roberts.
http://www.phillyada.org/blog/?q=node/28
Basically, I really have to say that Ramsey's tenure has so far been noticable more for his receptitiveness to community meetings, to reach out to various members of the community, rather than the opposite.
Philadelphia police-community relations have a ways to go still but a couple of quotes from the Inky article above really jump out:
And this.
I'm very interested to hear more concrete details about this recent arrest but to be absolutely clear the blank assertion that this mayor and this police commissioner are less then a noticeable step forward from the past in terms of community relations seems pretty dubious to me.
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.
Good Point on Ramsey, but they can still be` better
Well its an interesting collection of stuff, and I appreciate the contribution, as you make legit points. Perhaps they've been "better" which isn't necessarily good, and I think it is legitimate for people to challenge them to be better----this "stop and frisk" stuff is bad news all the way around.
I think the key point with this is not that one sentence you cite, per se (although i do appreciate the collection of quotes and links) but the point that it seems these activists just got pretty screwed over. I, too, am waiting for more information... But, I really want to help get the word out, so that the chances are better of these folks getting fair treatment and having the facts get out.
I've personally known the folks at Prometheus Radio for many years, and called both the folks listed at the bottom to confirm the email, so this does seem like a very serious story. There is precedent of activists being abused by Philly cops.
Fair enough
We have a long way to go from the culture of Frank Rizzo senior. Look as far as I am concerned with this and most things - its about accountability first and foremost. Nutter, whatever else, was the councilman who championed the establishment of the Police Advisory Commission in Philadelphia.If our aim is to work on establishing a community policing as a force for making ALL of our communities feel that the police work for protecting them, I would argue that we have never had a more receptive police commissioner and mayor to the idea that ultimately the police force serves and protects all of our communities.
At a basic level this is an administration for all its talk of aggressive enforcement against illegal guns that gets it. Its worth be trying to be strategic about how you put your point across to them. If you are interested in floating concerns as about "reform" and making the logic and theory behind law enforcement be about professionalism - I honestly think you will have a receptive audience with Nutter and Ramsey.
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.
YPP Standards
A vague email forward does not cut it here, especially if you are accusing people of fairly serious stuff. If you have more than that, post it. If not, please wait till you get something a little more concrete, like any sort of actual source.
There is a clear source
I don't consider this a "vague email forward". You ever heard of Prometheus Radio, who is clearly the stated author? You know, the philly-based media-activist group that has gained national attention for their good work?
While I am looking forward to hear more facts about this, I've known Prometheus many years, including both the people mentioned at the bottom as contacts, who I called myself and confirmed the email myself--so I consider this report to be very credible. I just helped make it a feature at the Philly IMC.
So, I stand behind this.
Sure, you can stand behind
Sure, you can stand behind it. But, this isn't a democracy, and I am telling you that it doesn't meet standards here.
When I say a source: how about a witness, how about a name, how about a first person account, how about a police report, how about anything at all?
There is much to be concerned about with police policies, public safety policies, etc. But, that doesn't mean an email that provides zero facts, while accusing the Mayor of pretty serious crimes, flies here. I doubt you will find many people who have been as critical of the Mayor (on a number of issues) as have been on the front page of YPP. But totally unverified/unverifiable accusations like this are not OK.
I am not trashing Prometheus radio or Philly IMC, and what they decide to forward, report on or feature. But different places have different standards, and if you are going to post here, that isn't a debatable point.
Disappointing
Prometheus Radio wrote this, and provides two names and numbers at the bottom, two folks who are fairly well-known activists. That is a clear source. Further, while the statement gives folks political backgrounds and speculates on motive, it clearly states that they haven't been charged with anything yet.... So no one really knows what's going on yet---but it's something.
Why do you think an urgent notice authored by the well-established Philadelphia group Prometheus Radio is not credible? Are you familiar with them and their work? They are an extremely reputable organization and are well established on the national scene of media-activism.
Certainly, I would like more information about this story, but in the meantime, I think we should show solidarity with the folks arrested, because publicizing this as quick as possible is very important for them.
--This said, you've already explained this website is not democratic, so I will formally log my extreme disappointment with your viewpoint, and then move on.
So wait
when you called did you find out anything else?
Also, re: 'website policy' or whatever, I'd like to say one thing, generally: a site like this exists in a weird space between journalism and, like, standing around the corner gossiping and talking politics. I think there's a great tool here to expand awareness of important stuff. People really do listen. It's also a tool to expand mutual understanding: I don't know everything, and I learn things by talking to people here all the time.
So I'd like to think that the policies should not be so much about Dan or Ray or me drawing lines or playing some pseudo-dictatorial role, but rather as encouraging everyone to just recognize the power and responsibility of having a platform like this, which even though it's virtual, creates a written record and has the power to affect the real world, for better and worse.
What the {BEEP] is going on?
On this website, why is it unacceptable for people to express conflicting views and support such views with whatever sources they deem appropriate? Do we, as Americans, not value freedom of expression? Or perhaps this is the kiss-[BEEP]-I'm-too-timid-to-disagree-because-my friends-won't-like-me place to come? I am beginning to think it is. It appears that the members of this website, this is directed only to the timid agreers, have as much backbone as public defenders and are cut from the same fabric as the African slaves who gave up "tapes" to master on the other slaves who had their eyes on freedom. This is sad. I thought Americans were raised to be leaders, not followers; I thought Americans were raised to be American. True Americans can not possibly be timid, impressionable, and weak to point they are scared to have and communicate different point of views.
KOBA
Dissenting views
Has it ever occurred to you that I might be the one expressing the "dissenting view" in this thread against what I see to be a bunch of tired old "Screw the Man" cliches and stereotypes that are a.) directly counterproductive to effecting any real change that will positively effect anyone's real life and b.) are in their own way every bit as biased and ignorant as the prejudices we all seek to eliminate from our society?
Beyond that, if you got a point to make you should be able to defend it with logic and facts not continually reffering to anyone who disagrees with you as "authoritarian" and or suffereing from a "slave mentality"? Why are "revolutionaries" often such unrepentant whiners?
To be clear from this side I will make it my business to call "B.S" when I see it on the right or the left but I'm just one opinionated guy. How is my expressing an opinion different from yours "un-American"?
I'm an angry "liberal" - in the classic sense. I believe in the discourse of demanding your innate "natural human rights", that the purpose of government is to protect those rights, that the triumph of liberal democracy and "one person, one vote" is a good thing. I tend to view the bulk of "revolutionaries" as being more invested in the "purity" of their gesture then in what actually will make our society a fairer more equitable place. I tend to get snippy with what I view as half-digested "anti-cop" conspiracy theories because I have heard lots and lots of poor people complain that they want more and better cops and i think some people would rather mix it up with the police than say start a community garden or fix our schools. Thats where I'm coming from.
You are free to disagree and point out how I am wrong on any number of things but its absurd to say that because I disagree with you that "dissent is being stifled". I am pretty good darn good at having a "dissenting opinion". Many would say too good.
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.
Koba,
All I wanted to say is that everyone benefits by using the forum for what it is best for--getting information out there and promoting dialogue. And, especially for a website read by city politicians and others who may be moved to take steps to help or intervene in a bad situation, it is helpful to do a little investigating and provide as much information as possible--or links to sources of further information. That way more truth is exposed, not less, and conversations are less likely to devolve into everyone just projecting their assumptions all over the place.
It is less about content, then tone, and the ability to engage dissenting views. If you recognize that everyone doesn't share the same politics, the next step is thinking about how you can engage in dialogue that might effectively challenge the political/philosophical/ideological presumptions that people--like it or not--already come to the table with.
Sigh
1. Maybe this is because I hate conflict, but I really wish this kind of stuff didn't immediately devolve and rather that the conversations moved in a productive rather than unproductive direction.
2. Danielle is my good friend, she is super smart and principled.
3. That email press release doesn't have a ton of detail. Obviously there are a series of questions that come up.
4. Sean, all respect, and the main point that the Dept under Ramsey has been relatively open and responsive to community is probably right, but going to or holding a particular set of community meetings doesn't logically mean that the department can't also be ignoring another set of concerns or demands for meetings.
Just to the part to me
Yes of course going to these 6 or 8 or 10 community meetings does not mean that every issue is dealt with but it seems to me that some of the meetings listed above, particularly the one hosted by Concerned Black Lawyers that if Ramsey was looking to run away from the issues, he could have. Also I have to note that according to several folks accounts about the ADA forum that a small contingent that was just interested in firing accusations rather than questions at Ramsey showed up and that it in a few instances got in the way of more substantive discussion, or even allowing other particpants in the forum from getting their say in. Its one thing to call specific practices into question, its another to decide to shout at the Police Commissioner just because they are the Police Commissioner.
To the more general point - I did a search for more specific information about this incident from more mainstream news sources - which sounds like they might cover - no doubt differently than IMC would - but would likely cover an event of note like this in some way. I couldn't find anything.
I'm not shutting down discussion, I'm asking for more details and questioning how trustworthy it is to put it across as plainly self-evident that the police would attempt to silence people for asking for a community meeting when Ramsey has so far been particularly noted for improved accesablity and responsiveness to community meetings. Frankly, I also think (or at least hope) that Ramsey probably has a issues a lot more pressing than going around on missions of political vengance against a couple of anti-"stop and frisk" protesters.
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.
Update on Arrests
The PhillyIMC just received this update from Prometheus Radio. As noted at the bottom, there will be a press conference on Monday.
BTW, thanks Jennifer for also vouching for the integrity of Danielle, the author of the email I posted.
UPDATE from Prometheus:
-----------------------
June 14th 8:10 AM Philadelphia. Homeowners were released from custody after being held without charges for up to 14 hours early this morning. The 4 were taken into custody yesterday after police arrived at their door without a warrant demanding entry to the premises. Upon being refused entry without the proper paperwork they arrested the homeowners and forced entry to the premises. After arresting the homeowners the police proceeded to call the Department of Licenses and Inspections which found the property in violation of various codes and permits and ordered the building cleaned and sealed. The police operation was led by 9th district Commanding Officer, Captain Wilson.
"Homeowners"?
I'm assuming the frequent references to "homeowners" are because the house might be mistaken for a squat, or at least there is concern that it might be mislabeled as such. I'm taking it the house itself is possibly in somewhat sketchy condition in terms of physical maintenance. So why the assumption that it has to do with "stop-and-frisk"? The involvement of L&I in with the spot condemnation and physically sealing the house could be politically motivated, but is there any possibility that the cops and L&I came out against the house itself? Like the cops wrongly assuming its drug house or squat.
I just don't see even the most nefarious police commander raiding a house because a couple of the people living there put up anti-"stop and frisk" flyers or what have you - particularly because they haven't even unveiled any of the proposed "Targeted Enforcement Zones" or even announced where and when they might do so. No announcement means no focused protest against the announcement. The whole thing seems kind of too nebulous to warrant the response. On the other hand I imagine this is a house with a lot of anarchist/activist types coming and going and the Presidential season heating up, the police have been known to do stuff like this in many cities say the week before a national political convention or World Trade Organization in order to round up potential protesters and hold them for the week preemptively, a la the RNC. The problem is I can't think of any specific marquis protest events like that coming up.
Is anybody in the house Hugs for Puppies or similar animal rights protesters of the type that attract attention from the Feds or state police?
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.
I am not stepping in to exert any sort of authority
But please please listen (not just you, Sean) when I say that I think that speculation back and forth is more hurtful than helpful at getting at the truth.
I'm not imposing a moratorium until more is known, or anything, but I wish that people would be more circumspect and not run around making assumptions.
Weird, bad, shit happens (the Hugs for Puppies/SHAC raid and subsequent prosecution was not exactly a model for the sort of law enforcement any of us should be supporting). Who knows if this is one of those instances. We just don't know. Skepticism is totally warrantely given lack of information, but there is no need to return with counter-speculation.
I'm waiting to see
I'm certain that these folks will be issuing more information very soon, and a likely press conference. So, until then, while interesting to speculate, we could be wrong on our guesses, so I'm waiting to see how it develops. So far it seems that the names of the homeowners are not being publicized, which is probably deliberate, as folks are probably recovering a little from shock, and strategizing on how to respond....
Re motives for this kind of thing, sometimes it is a HUGS FOR PUPPIES type group targeted by the feds, sometimes pre-emptive arrests before a big protest, but I'd say it's often just out of spite, and sending a message of intimidation to other activists.
I can say, though, from personal experience that an activist house I was living at got really messed with by L & I. Most of the folks were affilitated with KWRU (who had just done their month-long bus tour, but did not really have any major event approaching), and I had been a longtime, public MOVE/Mumia supporter, and had just interviewed Mumia via my house telephone a week or 2 before (at which point I had to give the prison every bit of personal info you can imagine)----when L&I showed up out of the blue, and said they were going to evict us if we didn't do some $40,000 renovation, essentially making a sealed hallway all up through our stairwell, making our house an official "boarding house" instead of just a group house where several people lived together cooperatively.
In this case, I feel it was clearly motivated by politics, and I think basically just to screw with our lives.
So, while I don't know too much about this recent house, and am patiently waiting for more info, I am willing to believe that it could be politically motivated, similar to what happened with my house.
Thats a heavy story
I can well imagine that L&I did get called in because of your Mumia involvement rather than just the KWRU. It may not surprise you that I personally am very skeptical of various alternate accounts of the Mumia-Faulkner incident and regardless of the ridiculousness of the court proceedings I personally am not a fan of anyone who sees a shootout going down on a Center City street and thinks the appropriate response is jump into that firefight with their own gun. A person who does that is not someone I want living on my block or hanging around the people I care about.
That said the anti-Mumia "cult" I'll call it - because the deification Danial Faulkner and the sainthood of Maureen Faulkner does take on a religious aspect in this town - gets down right creepy. Blatant racism often stand right behind the overly sanctimonious declarations of support for the Faulkners. The inability of so many people on both sides to talk about it with any level of detachment, the sheer craziness the topic engenders, is one of my least favorite things about living in this town.
Anyhoo back on topic, lets wait till more facts emerge.
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.