The Problem With Philadelphia Public Schools

Just as important to city politics as the ever-growing crime rate in our city, something needs to be done to address the problems facing our public schools. I read one blog on this site that said that the solution to the problem is to expand the schools that have long had success. Make them bigger, allow them to accept more students. The one thing that I DEFINATELY can say is that the way to fix all of the problems is NOT by expanding the schools that are excelling. Why brake what is working?

A lot of people are quick to say that the city's magnet schools (ie. Masterman, Central, Girls High, E&S, etc.) need to be expanded in order to allow more people to attend without looking at the reason WHY they are successful in the first place.

1)Masterman, which I have called "home" for six years, is by far the best school in the city (if not state). I do not in any way want to come off as conceited or arrogant, but this is fact. Masterman has always been (and probably always will be) the best, simply because it offers a learning environment unparalled by any other school - a SMALL population of hard-working, intelligent students. It's size and family-like structure are what make it unique. THERE ARE REASONS WHY 100% OF ITS HIGH SCHOOL'S STUDENTS GRADUATE!!

Nothing bothers me more than to hear of parents whose children were just not good enough to get in to Masterman calling the school board and protesting. This is the reason why a couple years ago Paul Vallas tried to expand the middle school into the Stoddard building down the street (which in the end failed miserably). The joint force of Masterman middle and high schools allows younger students to always have the benefit of mentorship by older students. If you remove the element of the close-knit community, the ideals of Masterman fall apart.

Sure, open the flood gates to Masterman. That way, the one of two nationally ranked high schools in the city just turns into an Olney or King - OOOOOO, maybe even Strawberry Mansion! Maybe people think that it is Masterman TEACHERS that are the reason for our success. I have one response...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Masterman students are brilliant BEFORE they come. Dont get me wrong, there are a number of amazing educators that have taught me things that I will remember for the rest of my life. However, logic and overall intelligence cannot be taught. Masterman was made for the district's academically elite - if your child isnt good enough, get over it. Masterman is FINE JUST THE WAY IT IS, THANKYOU.

2) Central, although our consistent rival, is yet another great school. However, when it comes to size, Central is huge. People who came from Masterman middle school to Central have told me on numerous occasions that they see someone new every day. AND YOU WANT TO MAKE IT BIGGER?

Then again, Central is huge. Im sure that there are a number of kids who slack off and dont care about school (just like neighborhood schools), but Central is so big already that a concentrated group of nerds can bulk up their ratings on paper enough to classify them as a great school. Not just for central, but all schools, what looks good on paper is not necessarily good in reality.

And Question - Why do some of the best schools in the city have the most run down, beat up facilities? E&S for example is a multi-sport powerhouse. Have you seen their gym? Two people cant stand in there without their toes touching. Now explain why Gratz was the recipient of a multi-million dollar sports STADIUM, one of many other super-sites being put up around the city. Why is it that the schools where the children are exceeding expectations are the last to recieve such nice things? I know that at Masterman most of our sports teams have to practice off-site - spending more time commuting to playing fields than actually playing their sports.

A few class mates and I were discussing this - how we had championship volleyball, tennis, swimming, and soccer teams but each of these sports (with the exception of volleyball) is forced to practice at various locations around the city (Tennis @ 33rd & Dauphin, Swimming @ WILLIAM PENN, and Soccer @ 42nd & Parkside). Then we hear about schools where college is not even an option for some, and yet they are the ones receiving the stadiums and newly refurbished pools and tennis courts. One person brought up, "I wonder if they give them these material things as an incentive to come to school. Masterman kids will come to school anyway (laugh)." And I agree with that thought. Why else? And yes, Masterman kids will come to school anyway. I wouldnt be able to say that if just any-old-body were accepted ;)). But its still not fair.

I'll have more on this later, I just felt like venting after I read that ignorant person's article.

Mastermanplan

Masterman's reputation for being a good school has been around since I've been teaching (11 years). That's why there is rarely any vacancies there, nobody wants to leave. However, I still think the quality of the teachers and the level of administrative support has a large part to do with its success, not just the students. Good teachers attract good teachers a vice versa. Nothing brings more joy than having a student who is interested in learning and realizes gaining an education involves working towards goals.
Vallas' lack of classroom experience shows with his decision to expand schools to eliminate middle schools. Instead of tackling the problem of no discipline at middle schools he ran from the problem with a quick fix solution. As a result many elementaries are suffering the results when they are expanded into the middle school grades. Daroff is an excellent example of how a school gets run down because of this stupid policy. Other schools are having to give up their police officers so they can patrol Daroff. This leaves their home schools vunerable on their days away. Smart move!
Moving good principals around to solve problems seems to be another tactic the district believes in. The only Philly principal I had that was worth a damn was forced out of her school (which she had worked hard to run right) and sent to another school to bail it out. Last I heard she moved out of being a principal role and into upper administration. Considering the dismal state of Philly principals it's sad the good ones leave. Like good teachers this district needs to bend over backwards to keep good principals too.
Alot of what goes into schools depends on the deals this administration makes with politicians and their pals. It has nothing to do with whether the student body has earned it. Why are the administrators working in a brand new building down on Broad when teachers throughout the district have to work in run-down, infested classrooms with the windows bolted shut?

Masterman Plan

Thats an excellent question! What on EARTH do they do at that building that is so much more important than the work that teachers are trying to do in schools? I have more to add to the post, im not just talking about sports facilities either. One time sitting in English class, a window that had been broken for a LONG TIME that no one had cared to fix fell out of the frame and hit a class mate of mine in the head. Luckily for her AND the school district, she was not seriously hurt. However, it is simply INSANE that anything like that should happen - espacially when the problem was known. School maintenance's initial response? They put a sign on the window saying do not open. It took a girl getting hit in the head after a gust of wind for them to do anything.

AND the better question - why is it that not ONLY did they build a new school district building worth millions but they cut a deal with microsoft to build an ADDITIONAL school, without actually fixing any of the run down, beat up, plain old CRAPPY schools we already have. AND what about the Science Leadership Academy? We dont need more magnet schools! Thats only ignoring the problem. Whoever steps in for Vallas at the end of this school year needs to fix the crumbling buildings instead of putting band-aids on open wounds.

Which is it? Smaller is better, or fix the big schools?

AND the better question - why is it that not ONLY did they build a new school district building worth millions but they cut a deal with microsoft to build an ADDITIONAL school, without actually fixing any of the run down, beat up, plain old CRAPPY schools we already have. AND what about the Science Leadership Academy? We dont need more magnet schools! Thats only ignoring the problem. Whoever steps in for Vallas at the end of this school year needs to fix the crumbling buildings instead of putting band-aids on open wounds.

While there may be some grounds to criticize Vallas (though I think the framework in which he was forced to work, politically and financially, was a major problem), I have heard in-person explanations of, and strongly agree with, Vallas's vision of more smaller high schools. He realized that fixing the Germantowns and MLKs wasn't going to happen in short order, and that those many students who are not necessarily at the Masterman/Central/Girls academic level but deserve better than the many disastrous huge high schools could benefit from smaller, focussed learning communities that have many of the attributes that you love about Masterman. By creating public/private partnerships like with the Franklin Institute, the Constitution Center, and Microsoft (though wasn't that deal in the works before he came on board?), he was able to access new revenue streams to help create these smaller learning communities, providing better and more choices to Philadelphia students, without placing the entire burden on the school district.

Vallas was very frank about what could and couldn't be done in the resource-constricted environment in which he worked. I've read recently some people say that he promised smaller classes, but I never heard him say that, except to acknowledge the problem and say that he needed more $$ from the state to do it.

Re: the new school administration building: that was a revenue-positive move. The district sold three of the former administrative buildings for $25.5 million, and the move reduced annual operating expenses by $1.2 million by consolidating operations that had previously been spread out across the different buildings.

The bottom line is that the state needs to decide that education is a state-wide burden, and the money needs to be moved around so that there is much less disparity in per-student spending. The deeper problems of having a district which has so many impoverished kids (76% eligible for free lunch and/or b'fast programs), many without the home structures necessary to support education, must also begin to be addressed.

Too little, too late

It's interesting how the district said they were planning on fixing the very window that cut off three fingers belonging that poor woman THE VERY DAY OF THE ACCIDENT!! They said basically the same thing about their failure to expell one of the two cowards that attacked Frank Burd.
School reformers have become the 21st century equivalent of carpetbaggers. Exploiting others' problems for their own personal gain.

In all fairness to Vallas...

As I understand it, one of Vallas' main objectives was to replace crumbling old school buildings w/new ones. As has been observed, and should be blindingly obvious, it's tough to learn while you're dodging crumbling building material.

Re: Masterman alums + Central: My father-in-law used to teach (9th grade history + Dean of Students) @ Central, and always says that the Masterman kids had trouble when they transferred there. He attributed this to Masterman inflating their grades, but it could certainly have had something to do w/the size issue you mention.

I went neither place, so I'm somewhat neutral on the matter,
-Z

Right, cause it can't have

Right, cause it can't have anything to do with the fact they probably have, on average, the smartest kids in the City and ones that typically come from stale families and aren't bringing crime issues into the classroom.

If you took the exact same structure and stuck kids from point breeze there, you may have a better situation than their normal school, but you won't be close to the level of success Masterman had as a magnet.

And then the question would be how long before quality started falling under the pressure of malcontent youth who have a 5th grade reading level?

It isn't class size or all that crap. The problem with the regular high schools are that the children are already lost by then. With Masterman, the kids are current on their expected education so it is ll about moving forward.

how do you teach high school american literature when all they can read is the sports page?

The grade schools need to be the focus, not the high schools.
--------------------------------------------------
Staff member of Longacre for 5th Council District.

Elementary Schools need to be the focus?

1) About Masterman students transferring to Central - inflated grades? Maybe. But that doesnt stop us from getting National Merit Scholars and higher SAT scores. Testing services dont inflate anything, buddy.

2)Learning Environment - You make a valid point. I distinctly remember growing up being the "smartest" kid in my class - but the thing is, I might not have been any smarter than the other children - my PARENTS were the ones who taught me early to value education and study before play. I remember coming home and having to do my homework right away while I heard the other kids on my street running around outside. They would get home and dart outside before anyone could tell them otherwise (that is, if someone else was even home). The work ethic I learned from my parents gave me a solid academic foundation that I thank them for now.

I do agree that many of the problems of the school district can be avoided by affecting young minds EARLY, but if there is no type of support at home than the work that elementary schools try to do to keep students engaged is pointless. If a child comes home and does nothing but watch tv, play outside with the other neighborhood kids, and are exposed to bad parental examples, how can you expect them to absorb schooling? If they have parents that dont respect society or themselves, what makes you think that they will accept school's authority?

Cultured children are less ignorant. Obviously. I was lucky enough to have parents that took me to museums on occasion and made sure that my mind wasnt being fed complete trash (We didnt have cable and once we finally got it, the parental controls were strict). Some parents just leave their kids with the remote and dont give a darn what they are watching - you can see this anytime a five year old is watching (and IMPERSONATING) WWE or HBO late night.

Another problem I can think of is the lack of sleep that American children are getting. A nine year old cannot go to sleep at midnight and be expected to function reasonably getting up at 7. Im not sure what the actual numbers are, but im sure 12 is WAAAY past their bedtime.

And by the way, what do you tell the ignorant children that have already rached highschool age?? Too bad, you have no future. In your next life, maybe your elementary and middle school teachers will be better to you.

Yes, Vallas was supposedly aiming to reduce the size of schools, but does expanding Masterman accomplish that? And why not split up the already over crowded schools and fix the buildings instead of opening new ones to AVOID THE PROBLEM? I dont understand...

I didn't say ignore the kids

I didn't say ignore the kids already in high school. ;)

My point is that the majority of the focus needs to start at the early levels to fix the system while we try to save the kids we are currently losing and are falling behind.

--------------------------------------------------
Staff member of Longacre for 5th Council District.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content