Three Council Candidates Who Will Fight Corporate Power: Cohen, Hornstein and Paulmier

Let me start by saying Neighborhoods Networks has a great slate of candidates to recommend in the Democratic Primary tomorrow. And here they are:

Kathryn Boockvar, Commonwealth Court, ballot # 102
Stephanie Singer, City Commissioner, ballot #169
Blondell Reynolds Brown, Council At-Large ballot # 179
Sherrie Cohen, Council At-Large, ballot # 180
Andy Toy, Council At-Large, ballot # 187
Jeff Hornstein, City Council, 1st District, ballot # 194
Maria Quinones Sanchez, 7th district, ballot #191
Greg Paulmier, 8th district, ballot #190

Kathryn Boockvar’s progressive cred is so outstanding, we endorsed her as soon as we heard of her candidacy. Please be sure to vote for her for Commonwealth Court. In the Council races, we endorsed candidates only after they submitted answers to a written questionnaire. We then posted their answers online for the world to examine. Finally, in the At-Large races, and in the 1st and 8th district where we have a significant membership, we polled our members and let majority rule. We think we did it the right way, and we’re proud of the endorsements our members came up with.

But I have to say, speaking for myself, that I’m particularly proud of three of NN’s endorsed Council candidates: Sherrie Cohen, Jeff Hornstein and Greg Paulmier.

I’m proud of them because they’re not intimidated by either corporate power or corporatist thinking. All of them are unabashedly in favor of progressive taxation. Sherrie Cohen was one of only two At-Large candidates at a recent forum who said, yes, workers should get time off to heal if they’re sick. She and Ralph Blakney were the only ones. I ask this: Why would a business want sick people to come to work? Who is going to benefit from that? How can the Chamber of Commerce be in favor of that? But we know that it is. Sherrie, however, said she supports mandatory, paid sick leave because it represents a “vision for a more just and equitable city.” Which, of course, it does, whatever the Chamber thinks.

In the 8th district, Greg Paulmier is the only candidate to have come out for public financing of election campaigns. He also said this in his answer to NN’s questionnaire on how to create more City jobs:

Require more guaranteed jobs for city residents up front from all companies and corporations, which receive City money PRIOR to receiving the City money. Hire first, receive grant or loan second.

Imagine that. Having the City ask businesses for something guaranteed in return for the City’s largesse, instead of just forking over big welfare checks to them. Someone somewhere will say, oh no, we can’t do that, that would create a bad “business climate.” And Greg would respond, I assume, yes we can do that. We must do that, I think he would say. It’s just common sense. We can’t just give our money away. Do we pay City workers first, and then just hope they come to work?

In the 1st District, Jeff Hornstein has confronted conventional thinking about the City’s Pension Fund, saying no, we don’t have to leave the $4 billion Pension Fund in the hands of Wall Street buccaneers. Wall Street is the destroyer of pension funds, City and State budgets and whole economies. Let’s invest some of the Fund in local, home grown businesses that provide jobs, and let’s recycle those dollars right here in our town. Let’s use the Fund to benefit Philadelphia families and also get a good return for the pensioners. And this is what Jeff said in his NN questionnaire about how to provide housing to our people. Essentially, stop treating it as a commodity for speculators:

I am a strong advocate for Community Land Trust legislation that would give community organizations the ability to acquire cityforever, essentially, so that they can be redeveloped into community assets rather than market commodities. This model works for parks, gardens, and urban farms, as well as housing.

These ideas are out of the box, or rather they’re out of the straitjacket that the Chamber of Commerce and its friends currently have City Hall wrapped in. Public policy can’t continue to be dominated by the demands of corporatists who pretend to care about the common welfare but who actually care only about their own bottom line. As progressives we rail daily about the fact that big corporations -- and their climate killing, job destroying and predatory investing policies – - are killing the poor and middle classes alike. But somehow here in Philadelphia many of us have adopted the mindset that every policy we adopt must be “business friendly,” meaning we do as we’re told by Comcast, Walmart. and Marriott. Well, progressives can’t fight that idea at the national level, and submit to it at the local level. It makes no moral, rational or political sense. Big capital here in Philly as well as everywhere else is looking out for itself, not for us.

Case in point: where are our business leaders on the education crisis that is threatening to destroy the next generation of our youth? If they cared about the economy of the City of Philadelphia, they’d be renting hundreds of buses to take us to Harrisburg to protest. They’d be supplying us all with camping gear to stay there until these crazy policies are reversed. They’d be dialing all their friends in high places – and they have many of them since they paid their way into office – to demand full funding of our schools.

Instead of that, they’re busy spending their political capital to demand that sick people come to work, no matter what.

To me, it’s important to know who will speak up and out to corporate privilege and power. And to elect these people to office, right now. Neighborhood Networks has an outstanding slate and I proudly back everyone on it. But for City Council, I’m especially proud to back Sherrie Cohen, Jeff Hornstein and Greg Paulmier. Please give them your vote. And tell all your friends.

NN endorsements - how/why did Paulmier beat Tyner?

I have to confess that a lot of why I'm not currently planning to vote for Greg Paulmier is an ill-defined "ick factor." He just rubs me the wrong way - and seems to do that to others as well, having lost his position as Ward leader and pissed off a lot of other folks. My impression is that these weren't principled disagreements, but breakdowns in horse-trading politics.

But NN's endorsements carry a lot of weight with me. I've been planning to vote for Verna Tyner for weeks - her experience in David Cohen's office, platform focus on education, and seeming electability are all attractive traits.

I have tribal reasons to vote for Greg - I'm a Quaker and a CW Henry School parent, like he is. But his insistence in staying in the race 4 years ago even when he clearly had no chance, his being removed from Reed Miller's office while begging her for her endorsement, after he'd spent 12 years talking publicly about how terrible she was for the District, and general unctiousness just turn me off from voting for him.

But now there's this business with the Reed Miller endorsement of Tyner, about which we won't of course have all the facts before the race ("Is it about more than one endorsement letter on Council letterhead?" and "Did Tyner know or ask?" are my main questions.) I'm wondering if I've missed something here. So if anyone has any insight into how the NN endorsement of Paulmier went down, I'd appreciate it. Was Tyner the #2 in the first round, and switchers from eliminated candidates went more to Paulmier, or what?

Paulmier doesn't mind being alone in a crowd.

And that's not a bad thing in City Council. My all time favorite Councilperson was David Cohen who an awful lot of people didn't like, and some pretty much despised. But that's because he didn't care about flattery, either to him or from him. Before making up his mind about something he would listen to a lot of people. But he didn't listen with an extra ear to the movers and shakers. He actually did give a damn about the people he was representing and expected other Councilmembers to do the same. If they didn't, he would call them out, publicly, obnoxiously even. But he got an awful lot done for someone who didn't give a damn about what the Inky, or the Chamber, or the Council power structure wanted him to do.

David Cohen and Greg Paulmier were close and Greg adored him. When David was seemingly at his death bed 10 years before he actually died, Greg made himself into his virtual nurse, unpaid, out of love. Greg loved Dave for his values, not his tact. And Greg shares both Dave's values and his (lack of) tact. He will get himself involved in almost everything, be driven by conscience, and say what's on his mind and heart. Most of the time, but not always, if you're progressive, you'll agree with him. But sometimes you won't and he'll piss you off. But most of the time he'll be pissing off those who hold the real power and want to keep it secret. He won't let them, and he won't let other people in Council hide from who really controls them.

If there were a majority of Councilmembers who were tactful but also fully committed to doing the right thing, this might not be the time for Greg. But there isn't a majority like that, and there won't be even after the change that's coming. And that's very much why we need Greg in Council at this critical time in the City's history.

Let me just close by saying these are my own opinions. There were three rounds of NN voting and I obviously can't speak for all the voters. But Greg got almost 60% in the final runoff between him and Cindy Bass. I suspect most of that 60% were also looking for someone who would be extremely unpleasant on the floor of Council whenever its real masters came calling.

Greg ran last time, and

Greg ran last time, and appealed all the way to the Pa SC, just for the pleasure of coming in 4th, and likely giving us another round of Donna Miller.

I was really disappointed by that decision from NN, but, it is what it is.

I wasn't too pleased with Greg's decision last time either

But I guess what it boils down to is, I got over it.

There's no one on the dance card in the 8th who gets an "A" (if that's the right metaphor.) That's probably why it took a few rounds of voting before we made a decision. But as a very smart guy once said, democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others. That goes for grass-roots organizations as well.

As I said earlier, I did personally wind up voting for Greg. Here and now in 2011, I do believe he's the best choice.

Ideals and self-interest and the 8th Council District

There is no politician--or serious organizational leader--who doesn't face conflicts between his ideals and his or her self-interest this time of the year, and in November as well.

That was true for Dave Cohen who was not just a great progressive leader but who, to stay in Council, was a ward leader who made deals with other ward leaders and supported some pretty awful candidates along the way. (And he didn't always support Greg Paulmier when that was in his self-interest.)

That's true for me. Because Penn ACTION is mostly focused on state and federal issues, I've thought it best for me not to get involved in a lot of City Council races this year because getting involved in factional disputes would compromise our ability to work with some legislators important to us. There are some people running for Council and Commissioner for whom I’d like to speak out. But my voice is pretty unimportant in those races so there is little reason for me to risk some important relationships by speaking out. (Whatever you think of our factionalized machine politics, Philadelphia politicians tend to look a lot better in Harrisburg and Washington than they do here.) The one exception is the Council at Large race where, because everyone gets five votes, I can support Sherrie Cohen while not opposing any one else.

In the 8th district I have another reason for reticence: a few friends are running including Cindy Bass with whom I've worked closely when she was President of EMAN while I was President of WMAN and Bill Durham who did a great job of managing my campaign when I ran for State Representative in 2004 and became a close friend.

I will say, however, I was disappointed with NN's endorsement in the 8th district. (I resigned from the NN Steering Committee some time ago and had nothing to do with it.) My sense of Greg Paulmier is that the balance between ideals and self-interest just tilts a bit too far toward the latter in his case. A number of his decisions over the years, including some mentioned above, leads me to think that his pursuit of the 8th district Council seat has come too often at the cost of good politics. (And, in the interest of full disclosure, let me say that I think another such case was in 2004 when I would have defeated Rosita Youngblood if he had supported me as he hinted he would more than once.)

Ideals and Community Self Interest Do Matter – to Greg

Here are Greg’s ideals as expressed in his answers to NN’s questionnaire and in his actions.

Greg cares about community, finding its authentic voice, and then fighting to support it. That’s why he was on the picket line for nearly three years fighting LaSalle’s effort to close a major community thoroughfare, at 20th St.
Greg favors progressive taxation in all of its forms, personal, real estate and business.

Greg supports corporate accountability. He would stop handing government money over to businesses in exchange for mere promises to hire. He would demand guarantees.

Greg opposes mindless privatization in City services, recognizing that privatization often means higher costs, fewer results.

Greg is single-minded in his focus on rehabilitating the housing stock and training young people in the skills needed to do that, thus providing both better housing, and real jobs for those who need them the most, our youth.

These are issues that are in the self interest of the 8th Councilmanic District, and that represent high ideals. I’m not going to comment on Greg’s political wheeling and dealing because 1) I know almost nothing about it, and 2) political horsetrading is the name of the game in Philadelphia. As you said, Marc, even the best of them, like David Cohen, have done their fair share of it.

So no, Greg Paulmier is no angel. But he’s the best candidate for Council in the 8th Councilmanic District.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content