On this Day After Tax Day, here are two graphics showing you how tax dollars are spent in Pennsylvania and the U.S.

First, this graphic, from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, details how federal tax dollars are spent on public services that we rely upon everyday.

This graphic, created by the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center using U.S. Census Bureau data, shows how state and local tax dollars are spent on similarly critical public services provided in our communities.

In today’s (3/30/10) Philadelphia Inquirer, Kristen Graham reports “95,000 children are under DHS care in city schools and in out-of-school programs.” This number is way too high as it represents over 35% of the children in the school district. Think about it, we run a school district where more than one in three children are under the supervision of someone other than their parents.
We can sit by and do nothing about this as we have for many years. We can blame teachers as many have done for no reason and with no satisfactory results, or we could recognize and deal with the situation.
Just as we have schools that are so called drop out factories, I suspect, based on socio-economic factors and crime statistics, that we can identify neighborhoods where concentrations of parents at risk of raising children at risk are located. Certainly DHS can confirm if such neighborhoods exist.

On March 17, we joined many concerned citizens and groups to comment in council on the proposal to add a "soda tax" and more importantly a flat fee for trash collection.

Since the soda tax really isn't the classic excise tax, we gave it short shrift. It'll bring in some revenue, that's about it.

But the regressivity of the flat fee for trash collection really needs to be re-examined. after a brief flurry of news and noise, attention has drifted, so I wanted to bring it back and keep in peoples' minds.

The impact on poorer areas is truly astonishing. The tables attached to our testimony makes that clear. In many neighborhoods, the flat trash fee far exceeds the total property tax an average house pays, and when the city portion of the property tax is isolated the numbers go off the charts bad.

Let's not forget to include the crooks at AIG and Goldman Sachs. Last thursday, Bloomberg posted an article entitled "Geithner’s Fed Told AIG to Limit Swaps Disclosure" - Apparently emails have been leaked that show a criminal conspiracy to commit financial fraud.

Before I begin posting here, I want to give my potential readers some background information as a starting base of knowledge that you should all become familiar with as i will be discussing these topics ad nauseam. along with, current news, local news and how it correlates to the information presented below. thanks very much to the creators of ypp, i am very grateful and appreciative to have a forum on which to discuss pertinent political problems on a local level. also, i would like to thank anyone who takes the time to look at the information below, let alone follow me on this journey down the very deep rabbit hole.

The Obama Deception - http://www.obamamovie.tk/ - 1hr53minutes

Fall of the Republic - http://www.falloftherepublic.tk/ 2hrs23minutes

Hyperinflation Nation - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbUIlH0stSc - 27minutes

Generation Rx - http://www.megavideo.com/?v=6OOFGO11 1hr20minutes

I woke up Monday morning to hear on WHYY that Governor Rendell had abandoned the idea of imposing a tax on the extraction of natural gas from our state's massive but deeply buried reserves of natural gas. If he'd given a better explanation for his decision, I might be able to keep quiet about it, but the reason he said we shouldn't do it because it would kill a fledgling industry. Hogwash. Everywhere else the industry operates has a severance tax already and we've got more gas here than all of them combined (well, okay, we have the most, hands down -- no one knows exactly).

Besides, it's not a new industry at all. It's the same rigs, same teams, same operations already operating in Texas and Wyoming and Colorado. Moving to a new state doesn't make it a new industry. In fact, moving those rigs around to tap new gas plays is just how the business works. They already know how to do it. That's the essence of what they do.

So, the Inquirer did an editorial today spelling this out with numbers. Why, they ask, should we believe that a modest tax would quash this operation when the revenue forecast of the main players are so rosy? It seems like there is plenty of money there.

Some context the Inquirer didn't mention. Did you know that we don't tax the extraction of any natural resource from our state? Not coal. Not gas. Not wood. Not freaking gravel. Why? Because the coal industry is so powerful here that they have time to argue about any severance tax because they believe that as soon as one resource gets taxed that would take us that much closer to taxing coal. And they don't want that to be taxed ever. So they fight them all.

Awesome.

But we had a Governor who had said he would back taxing gas and Democrats who said they would, too. We had that, but now we don't anymore. It's too bad. Fortunately, the House Dems seem to be standing pat on Severance Tax, and that's the right call. Rep. George told PA Environmental Digest that he's standing firm on the Severance Tax and that Speaker McCall is with him.
Clean Water Action Pennsylvania

believes that the severance tax is so important that we canvassed part of McCall's district on it recently and delivered a stack of letters to him from locals who agreed: tax the shale and make it pay for environmental protection.

In fact, we specifically argue that a piece of the tax should be used for hiring and training enough DEP inspectors that one can be on site for each well bore at the stage of siting, drilling, cementing, stimulating and the closing of waste pits.

It's Our Money's Ben Waxman had a nice set of factors that might make the sales tax hike get accepted in Harrisburg called "Selling the Sales Tax," including my favorite weird rationale that started with Mrs. Verna: the higher rate will help business elsewhere.

Who thinks this will pass? Why do people think the silence has been deafening on this phase of the process? And hey, Ben, who the heck is CleanUpPhilly?

Where do we go from here? Down to the lake I fear.

For the record this is my screed on the sales tax issue right now.

The question unasked in all of this is: How in the face of declining receipts at a 7% rate, will more revenue get collected at a higher 8%? State-wide, receipts from the sales tax dropped $100 million below estimate, to about $600 million. In Philly itself the decline is 6.7%.

Missed nearly everyone at the first public hearing on the Mayor's Task Force on the tax structure, and economic competitiveness. Jonathan Stein showed up, nice to see, but otherwise the witness part of the room was nearly empty.

On the selfish side, I'm glad the LVT advocates had lots o'time, but on the public service side, I'd suggest that anti-establishment viewpoints try to make the next one.

The Chamber of Commerce had all the time in the world to build a case for privilege and their pro big dogz agenda.

Next one's in August.
Joshua Vincent

www.urbantools.org

YPP may not be the right place to post this essay. But the issue raised in the debate about the LVT have gone to the cutting edge of contemporary thought about distributive justice. So maybe it will be helpful.

There is no tax system that, from every point of view and in every particular case, will always look just. That’s true for two reasons. First, our intuitions about justice are quite varied and what looks just from one point of view might not look just from another. Second, what looks just in the micro case might be impossible to create in an large, complex market based economy. Thus we can’t define rules of justice for a political economy as a whole that looks only at the individual case and does not take into account the broad consequences of one or another set of political and social arrangements.

The Income Tax: Some Cases

EVERYONE'S INVITED TO A MEETING

with

City Controller Candidates
BRETT MANDEL & ALAN BUTKOVITZ

Tues. April 14th at 7PM SHARP!
PALUMBO REC CENTER
10th and FITZWATER Sts.

ALSO:
---------------------------------------------------------
Learn How We Can Keep
PROPERTY TAXES from SKYROCKETING w/ Josh Vincent ---------------------------
Learn About Bella Vista's NEW Triangle Park –
our community's 5th park!
----------------------------------
Get Details on Upcoming Bella Vista KIDS FAIRE, sponsored by St. Rep Babette Josephs this Spring

and learn more about this Fall's PHILADELPHIA ZOO DAY IN BELLA VISTA. The animals are coming to the hood!

Bella Vista United Civic Association
www.bvuca.org

I was a big supporter of Mike Nutter from the time he announced his candidacy for Mayor of Philadelphia. And I'll give him appropriate credit for attempting to take serious fiscal measures to deal w/the serious fical problems facing Philadelphia.

But I question the notion that he can enact temporary hikes in property taxes + the local sales tax. Temporary taxes? Two words for that: Johnstown Flood.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnstown_Flood

The Johnstown Flood was an enormous disaster which occurred in 1889. It was so enormous that a special tax was added to liquor sales (in 1936) to assist in paying for relief to the affected areas. This tax remains on the books today, long after even the great grandchildren of the victims of the flood are gone.

Following up on Brady's post ("Due Credit") on the ACORN action (and it looks like he beat me to it this morning, as I was typing) against the Eagles for the $9.6+ million owed in back luxury box revenue, I wanted to post on Mayor Nutter taking it to another set of tax deadbeats

Hanging out near the Coral Street Arts House tonight? join the NKCDC on a discussion of taxes, budgets and economic sanity...

Thanks to Hannah for already linking to this New York Times article, but this really is worth a more in-depth look:

PHILADELPHIA — Mayor Michael A. Nutter said Tuesday that Philadelphia would have to raise taxes or fees to close its budget deficit.

"We can’t just cut our way out of this situation," Mr. Nutter said in an interview with WHYY radio. "We will have to consider very seriously some form of revenue enhancement."

This new rhetoric from the Mayor comes following the publication of PennPraxis’ report on the recent citywide budget hearings. The summary of the talks is incredibly encouraging of the sensibility and humanity of a majority of Philadelphians – and not surprising for those of us on YPP who commissioned a poll months back that yielded similar conclusions. The difference is of course that this report hit the national news as a city that is demanding other options.

The report says that the majority of people:

• don't want services cut

• will pay more in taxes if they have to

• want to ease the tax burden on low-income people

• and would consider alternative correction opportunities for non-violent offenders if it could mean closing a city jail.

"Given a chance to confront the tough tradeoffs, most citizens opted to tax themselves — while struggling to give a tax break to those less fortunate," said a report by the Project for Civic Engagement at the University of Pennsylvania, which organized the meetings.

Working groups concluded that residents would be prepared — though reluctant — to pay higher taxes on sales, wages, real estate transfers, businesses and parking, said the report, published late Monday.

That's pretty amazing.

What’s most encouraging though is that in times of crisis, people want to know that government is there to take care of core and essential services that benefit and protect not only the majority of its residents but especially the most vulnerable.

It's great to be a part of this city.