- beautiful
- Speck Fitted
- PA Job Numbers Out, The War On Unemployment Insurance, and Inequality
- Pennsylvania Hunger Games Diet: Cash for Corporations, Cuts for Kids
- The Incredible Shrinking Mayor
- Multi-tasking with the 1% … killing the schools AND making the poor pay for their funeral.
- Council Can Give the SRC the Money to NOT Privatize the System
- Predatory Payday Lending Bill Flies Out of Cramped PA House Committee
- Let the Games Begin: PA Senate Announces Details of Budget Proposal
- Good News on PA Revenue But Don’t Count Your Blessings Just Yet
Where is our 21st century vision for transit?
So, we are in a crisis. And while we individually take some blame, we all know that much of this is the reality of America right now. I may argue that the Mayor has done some things wrong with the budget, but, it is pretty hard to blame him for the fact that the value of the pension fund has cratered by hundreds of millions of dollars.
Meanwhile, the Mayor is taking heat for all the new hires he has made in his office. Personally, I don't necessarily see hiring new deputies as a big deal, especially if they can earn their keep by generating savings or economic development or smart policies for the City. (For example, if Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Everett Gillison figures out a way to remove from our prison system the non-violent, alleged offenders, who simply can't afford bail, he will save us tens of millions of dollars every year.) Which brings us to transportation, where we have another one of these Deputy Mayors, Rina Cutler. Presumably, with someone devoted to transit full time, we will have someone thinking a lot about SEPTA, and how we can expand it and make it better.
And yet, I get a queasy feeling that with the Federal Government about to pass a stimulus package worth around 850 billion, and with the amount of money for mass transit increasing, we might miss a once in a generation chance to undertake an ambitious, productive, and expensive mass transit project that could generate jobs and economic expansion in Philadelphia for years. In this stimulus bill there are billions of dollars for transit. There are also rumblings that with Democrats in control, the next few infrastructure bills will also be very large, and there are a number of Senators and Congresspeople who are pushing hard to make sure that mass transit gets real funding.
In response to that, where is our plan for transit expansion? Not just new cars, but real expansion of the system? Where is our proposal for a light rail system that goes up and down Delaware Ave? Where is our proposal for another line (that connects to the Delaware one,) that goes from Front and Spring Garden all the way through N Liberties and Fairmount, to Mantua and through to the rest of W Philly? Where is our proposal for light rail up the Roosevelt Boulevard, where buses run approximately every 2(!) minutes, and are still filled to capacity?
As we know, and as the national media knows, much was made of the fact that in the Mayor's huge, 2.7 billion dollar wish list for Obama, there was a 125 million dollar ask to to prep East Market St. for the Casino. Here is what the Mayor has asked for in mass transit:
And here is what SEPTA says it wants:
In the Philadelphia region, SEPTA has a $480 million list of projects it would like to tackle, including $175 million worth that it says could be started within 120 days of funding.
The area projects include reconstructing the Fox Chase train station, upgrading stations along the Chestnut Hill West rail line, improving lighting in the Center City commuter tunnel, renovating restrooms at the 69th Street Terminal in Upper Darby, and improving electrical substations and maintenance shops.
All worthy projects, I am sure. But really, that is it? Is expansion of the system not worth going after?
Deputy Mayor Cutler seems like knowledgeable person. But so far, she has made her mark by jacking up the cost of driving and parking into the city, all to deal with congestion, a problem candidate Michael Nutter addressed during the Mayoral campaign: (Inquirer, May 1, 2007.)
Brady, Nutter and Knox had harsh words for Fattah's proposal that Philadelphia ought to study imposing a congestion charge on suburban commuters driving into Center City.
Such a charge would reduce pollution and provide a funding source for SEPTA, said Fattah, noting that New York City is studying the idea for Manhattan.
Nutter said such a charge would be "devastating" for retail businesses and city-suburban relations. Brady quipped that "the only one thing worse than traffic is no traffic."
(Yes, I know, somewhat different plan, driving versus parking, but still certainly is effectively a congestion charge to suburban drivers, and is just as likely to be harmful to Center City retail.)
So, since we are paying all of this money for a Deputy Mayor for Transportation, instead of enriching parking lot operators, maybe we should start thinking really, really big. And, of course, maybe the big planning for all of this is happening behind the scenes. But right now, from an outsider's perspective, this seems a chance to make positive change that we are letting slip right by without even trying.
Much has been made about those salaries. But, if we get a new line of transit, with rail cars built here in the City, then Deputy Mayor Cutler will have earned her salary ten times over. I realize that there are many small things we need, for SEPTA and all over the City, but if we don't at least try for the big stuff, we sure as hell won't get it.


I touched on some basic ideas
in this earlier post
But again-
1. a modern fare card system. More and more people like to use plastic money. The whole rigamarole with cash transactions and only some station agents will sell tokens and some won't - I have to say the current system is not user friendly to first time riders and seems clunky and cumbersome. For comparison look at the PATCO fare system which uses the same smart cards for fares and parking fees.
2. Safety - with that subway attack last summer it became evident once again that the SEPTA call boxes need to actually work and be audible and that SEPTA and regular police radios need to work in the stations. This would make riding more desirable to many and after the London subway terrorist attacks can definitely be sold as a legit homeland security concern.
3. Next Bus or a similar GPS system so you can see when the next trolley, bus, train is actually coming. These systems often can use advertising to pay for themselves after the initial set-up. Why friggin' not?
Note anyone who has not checked out this system should. Brilliant.
http://www.nextbus.com/corporate/works/index.htm
4. Vendors in the concourses to make them safer/more populated and while you are at generate rental income for SEPTA
In terms of really big
Some classics are:
1. Rail line for Roosevelt Boulevard - one of the most congested and dangerous roads in the country
2. working rail access for King of Prussia Mall
3. Transit line for the ever exapanding 202 corridor
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.
Wow... SEPTA expansion
I think that this discussion depends on whether or not we're trying to come up w/a wish list, or ways to expand and sustain ridership. Since we've already had plenty of talk about the wish list, I'll suggest a few of the latter ideas:
* Unified, 'Smart Card' fare system. SEPTA currently uses a mishmash of 19th, early-20th, + late 20th century fare systems. Replace them all w/a single fare card. If you could work w/the PPA to make this same fare card useful on parking meters, it would be an additional bonus.
* Catch up on all the 'deferred maintenance' which has plagued the system over the past decades. Yes, bringing the Girard + Spring Garden Stations into the late 20th century is a good start, but it can't be the total work done. Hell, reliable cleaning of all stations would be a welcome change.
* Electronic signage on heavily-used stops to indicate when the next bus/trolley/train is expected.
* Better bus shelters at heavily-used stops.
* Increase frequency of bus + Regional Rail service. Smaller trains running frequently carry more passengers than large trains running less frequently, so use the former model rather than the latter. The former model has the side benefit of employing more people.
* Establish late-night service on *all* Regional Rail lines.
* Replace *all* diesel buses w/hybrid models. This can be done on an as-needed basis, by replacing all diesel buses @ end of service w/hybrid equivalents. But it *needs* to be done.
* Restore trolley service to lines where the infrastructure remains in place. Aside from any talk about aesthetics, electric trolleys produce *far* less air pollution than diesel buses, and are capable of moving more passengers per vehicle to boot.
* I've said it before + I'll say it again: better enforcement of traffic laws is utterly critical to the smooth operation of street-running transit, whether buses or trolleys.
My $0.02,
-Z
Not Enough
Instead of focusing whether the projects submitted by Philadelphia are sufficient, I suggest we ought to be considering whether the Obama Plan spends the right amounts.
Right now, you're talking billions. In Bush's plan, the banks got hundreds of billions. In Obama's plan, cities are talking about dividing up "a billion dollars." Singular. Not even multiple billions.
What if Philadelphia got what Bank of America got? Just imagine what Philadelphia could build with that?
We ought to be asking how about giving our cities something along the same lines as the banks got.
silly dewitt
silly dewitt, those bank bailout funds are supposed to be used for giant conferences for AIG and paying bonuses. It's not for ordinary people, just masters of the universe.
God, the way you talk, you'd think that all that taxpayer money was ours or something, or that we should have some say over how our money is spent.
Bob Casey knows best: give it to the banks, no strings attached, and then cry when they keep it.
Not too side with the banks
but the idea was the money to the banks was that it was money the government would recoup once the credit crunch got unstuck. Unfortunately that hasn't happened. The banks are still fronting on their levels of toxic debt, still not being 100% transparent to each other or to Congress on their risk levels and as result the economy is still frozen. The Obama administration has a big announcement next week, most likely a fully nationalized "bad bank" to set the price for high-risk toxic loans and buy up the bad debt off the banks books.
I'm not an economist but I've been wondering if we should also be coming at the banks from the other side actually. Why not start a new "good bank" with new tougher ground rules for higher levels of transparency and accountability for banks selling their new mortgage and commercial loans and pump it full of capital so the banks have an avenue to start pumping more credit back into the system now with a very high-level of security - so more real people can get home and business loans right now, even if the banks are slow to trust each other (possibly for good reason). The "good bank" could set the bar for transparent assessment of risk in reselling loans, standards private banks would seek to match in their own new loans practices. Anyhow, thats the idea I've been ruminating on lately and I'm curious what economist types make of it.
But I of course also think more money in the real economy, paychecks in workers hands that at the same time make us stronger for building a greener, less carbon emiting future economy would be important as well. It just takes about 6 months for the money to come out the other end of that hose, as I understand it. The worst thing we did as Brendan points out was give money to prop up bankers who kept running their businesses "as-is" when obviously we would not be in this mess if they were doing things the right way in the first place. New money should equal new practices from corporate America - period-and thats why more and more I think we should open a lane for highly transparent lending with a high level of transparency for all involved.
OK enough armchair world economic planner for now.
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.
Long-Range Vision for Transit
See DVRPC's Long-Range Vision for Transit here.
See my blog post about the "Long-Range Vision" here.
That's it
That's a great plan, Greg.
Somebody in Michael's office should be selling that to somebody in the White House right now.
The Navy Yard is huge and would become hotter than it already is. Rip up a couple of South Jersey office parks and plant them there; that's green thinking for the 21st century. And connecting the real Northeast to the rest of us makes sense and might make us a more unified city.
The rest of it too, just a great plan.
On a related subject, SEPTA was working on a Metro card system last year; does anyone know where they are with that?
Great points, major development isn't as hard as it seems
I like the points here. Philadelphia has so many resources, they just need to be tapped and the City has to be willing to work along side of businesses that are capable of generating jobs and positive economic development. All that it took to lure a cost-conscious financial company like BlackRock to the banks of the Schuylkill was a nice office building and tax abatements. Sure, the deal isn't done yet, but I think we can attribute that to the circumstance of the economy and their business sector climate, not the terms of the deal.
As the shameless promoter of the Northwest and more specifically Germantown that I am, I think that deals like this are able to be done all over the City. If the City cannot harness all of the resources that we have up here, well, I think that's just sad and shows just how poor our leadership is.
A great example is our close neighbor, the old Budd property in Nicetown. I think all you have to do is get on the phone with developers and companies that are building data centers and office parks around the country. Give them the business tax abatements that BlackRock could get. Wage tax abatements? I don't even think that they are important because they don't affect a company's bottom line. You just make a commitment to them you will continue the tax cuts that make Philadelphia so uncompetitive. It's a short-term and intermediate-term win. It's also a near long-term win. All you have to do to secure the far long-term win is to make good on your commitment. With great transit connections with Wayne Junction and the Roosevelt Expressway, it makes so much sense. The research has been done. People seem to be very desirous to develop in the City again. We just need to resolve the well-documented issues that have plagued us for so long.
Furthermore, I have no problem with winning back development from the likes of Montgomery county, Bucks county, Delaware county, and South Jersey. They have easily swooped in and taken what Philadelphia should have had, provided the City didn't strangle itself with its own tax policy over the years. Urbanization would be good for our communities and country. It would help to stop the suburbanization has ripped our cultural fabric on both a regional and national level. It's time to set a new course and bring back the concept of neighborhood. It's something we all deserve and need. We just need to make it happen.
pardon my early am stupid...
but is that blank space after "what the mayor asked for" deliberate?
please tell me there's a missing youtube or something. I missed that whole discussion.
There is a spreadsheet you
There is a spreadsheet you arent seeing.
whew
my cynicism was about to go into overload, effectively shutting me down for the day.
The spreadsheet is pathetic though
Its basically overdue fleet maintenance, not a vision for how to drive up usage and make SEPTA a dramatically more succesful transit agency.
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.